Trespass is not harmless, you are harmed by the trespass which is why you can sue them for damages. Waiting to bait them in just to shoot them is psychotic, it is 100% legal to draw a gun on people at your house. Watch them flee like the cowards they are. Plus I had the wife and kids at home and didn't feel like having them raped. Unlike retarded libturds like you who would have offered up your daughters & wife, then sucked them clean afterwards then bent over spread the buttchecks and let them take a turn. Then thank them afterwards for their courage for being stunning and brave people of color and apologize for inconveniencing them and acknowledge that you live on stolen land. Anything less than treating them like the kings and queens they are is just wrong. That about right pussy libturd?
They were obvious criminals, you don't need 4 people to sell security systems, you don't wear bandanas on your face when selling security system, you don't hide from view of the front door when selling security systems. If there was any justice the news headline should have been Homeowner repels burglars with AR-15.
Yes, you can sue them for damages. Of course it would be incumbent upon you to prove the measure and extent of the damage. Of course I never said it isn't legal to draw a weapon on suspicious people who come to your house. You're just making sh!t up with the rest of your post.
My long-held and established opinion is that citizens should be able to lethally shoot perps who B&E houses, garages, outbuildings, and vehicles for pragmatic reasons. Police say that 90% of the crimes is committed by repeat offenders. I concluded that shooting perps who B&E vehicles at fishing access sites and boat launches or try to steal catalytic converters would prevent a lot of recidivism and repeat offenses. How's that for pussy libturd?
Previous Topic
Index
