The fish disease policy is likely a model of co-manager cooperation. I don't think that can happen now, given that the treaty tribes effectively run WDFW's anadromous fish programs. I'm supportive of treaty fishing rights, but I don't care to have the tail wagging the dog. Some of the tribes (at a minimum) have a very different view of hatcheries than I do. I'm not anti--hatchery, but I'm enough of a realist to accept that hatcheries cannot deliver the recruit performance that they did in the past. This makes them uneconomic, but we're still ripping off taxpayers to continue hatchery programs that don't pencil out. I oppose that, and that makes me a bit of an outlier. I would have the co-manager hatchery policy inject a reasonable dose of economic reality into the equation. Along with the disease policy, of course.