Originally Posted By: Streamer
No comeback or counter-argument? Care to offer another logical explanation?

Salmo, nobody can be right about everything all the time and you are certainly not the exception. Clearly, you are wrong on your opinions of this and you should be embracing the opportunity for growth and admit that your opinions may have been wrong and short-sighted.

Loosely related, Fish Prince and I were talking the other day about the Disney executive who claimed to have had a transgender child and a pansexual child ages 5 and 7 (extremely young). Statistically, the odds of this being true are approximately 1:3,000,000. What is overwhelmingly more likely from a statistical standpoint is she is a pathological narcissist sacrificing her children for the glorification of her noble cause and acknowledgment to the LGBTQ community to satisfy her desire for attention with fake compassion that she doesn’t have.

Your cognitive dissonance has been noted and it is overwhelmingly more likely your perspective is wrong but you are unwilling to acknowledge it. What will happen is you will continue to argue your points despite clearly being wrong, ignore this all entirely, or change the subject. Prove me wrong for your own sake and admit that you were wrong.


Streamer


Limited engagement here over the past 2 weeks due to being out of town and my computer in the shop for the past week, limiting me to an ancient relic and 1-finger typing. The other reason, as I mentioned before is that engagement here is largely a waste of keystrokes.

I agree that I am not right all the time and change my opinion often enough when presented with "clear, cogent, and convincing evidence." It is not clear to me that my opinions of Kirk are wrong. Honestly, I don't know much about him, but my limited exposure to his "so called" debates indicate that they are anything but debates, and his "prove me wrong" exercises looked like made for him opportunities to belittle and put down folks who disagreed with him. Give me evidence to the contrary, and I'll change my opinion.

As for racism having gone by the wayside in the US, why then does Georgia reduce the number of election precinct stations in black voting districts but not in white districts? Are you sure it has zero to do with race?