Why is everybody blaming Tony Dunnington for what is published in STS? Isn't it the responsibility of the editor (Nick Amato?) to determine what gets printed? I've read part of the story about Dunnington giving away information but don't know the whole story. What I've seen Dunnington write about in STS reveals a lot less than what I've seen written in WA/OR Fish and Game about specific fishing holes on my favorite river.