Gee, I wonder what the response here would have been if WT had to sue WDFW to restrict commercial netting?

Somehow I doubt there'd be howls about that 'extreme' tactic taking up the agency's time and money. If fact, I think there'd be a whole lotta 'attaboys' and no nonsensical deliberating over whether the organization is about fish, fishing or the environment.

Good job JJ and Silver Hilton for trying to add a rational perspective.

Talk about distraction! Bashing organizations that you're in agreement with, probably 90% of the time, and then trying to punish the companies that comprise the sportfishing industry, all the while letting the dam operators, etc. off the hook for the very real damage they do everyday is logic I cannot follow.

Boycott Amato, Loomis, etc. NO WAY!