The fact that there are WMDs is clear and even the opponent countries conceeded to the presence WMD's prior to the war. What they did not agree on was the threat level. Where they are now is an issue. Right and wrong can only be detrmined after the conclusion of an event. To judge the administration on such a small bit of conjecture is silly at best.

Is it hard to imagine that it may be in the countries best interest not to lay all it's cards on the table and telegraph to the world our strategy and plans. That possibly the WMD issue as a reason to go to war had a bit more marketing advantge to all you experts out there than saying, you know what the cold hard fact is we are going to have to strangle the pipeline of terrorism by isolating , Iran, Syria, SA , Eqypt etc or just out right launch on them. In doing so we have to do it in a way as to not crash the global economy or kill a billion people.
Everyone says they want the truth but just like children sometimes getting what they want is too harsh.