I'm against the wild fish ban! Every river in the state besides the northern coastal rivers already has a no wild fish retention. From what I have heard and read on the coastal rivers, the wild fish have been doing quit well. I believe that most people that fish the coastal rivers already catch and release most of the time anyway. I know that nothing really can be done to fix the real problem (INDIAN GILL NETS). I am just a firm believer that stopping the sport fisherman from keeping a wild fish every now and than isn't really going to help. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for enhansing the wild fish populations. I just don't think this will help. It will only allow the indians to net more WILD FISH!!!