I guess I'll repeat myself again...and leave it at that.

Normal process? Perhaps not.

Does that make it wrong? At least five of the eight Commissioners don't think so, or they wouldn't have voted for the moratorium. And Chairman Roehl, while having reservations about not going through the "normal" process, assured Mayor Reed that it was not improper.

So that's at least six of the eight who don't feel it was improper. Extraordinary, maybe, but improper, no.

An AAG was at the meeting, who also assured the Mayor and CoC that it was not improper.

Being extraordinary does not in and of itself make it a violation of the APA. Violations of the APA make it a violation of the APA, and we'll soon see what Fork's petition alleges about the APA, and perhaps then we'll have a clearer idea of what APA violations may or may not have happened, at least to their minds (Forks and the Forks CoC).

As I've said many times, not liking the way it happened does not make it illegal, or improper...just extraordinary.

Fish on...

Todd