Am,

This is a good example of someone using a bible passage to try and twist it's context to meet their need. We need to pay attention to the 4 laws of translation as proscribed by the Biblical research Society. You quote a passage as litteral (the first rule) when there are other passages later on which give more detail and clarification of the true meaning of this passseage. So using the 3rd law of translation Recurrence we see more clarification and better context. This series of text refers to the invasion of Isreal from the North and the subsequent destrutction of the invading armies. It does not support your claim that Christians are required to convert jews or support the destruction of Islam in any way. Try again. Given the time it took you to reply I take it your Google bible debate will take you too much time to form any basis of intelligent undrstanding of the bible. It's much easier to just balnket hate Christians and balme them for the worlds ill's.