cool, an argument for a change.

I'm going to assume this is where you trot out the 'aiding and abetting the enemy' argument.

Only when you do, try to get it straight, ok? 'War crimes' are pursued by the world court, not the us military, so your argument is flawed from the get go.

Furthermore, even if war crimes were punishable by the us military Kerry couldn't be prosecuted for what you are suggesting because HE WAS EXCERSISING HIS RIGHT AS AN AMERICAN TO FREE SPEECH as a civilian over whom the military has no jurisdiction.

So the only possible answer to your question is AWOL.

Maybe I'm not getting it...try rephrasing the question.