Okay, since you only made a couple of plausible points out of all that gibberish, let's take a look at them, shall we?
If you hadn't wittnessed him doing anything wrong---would you go before the entire world and call your brother a "RAPIST and BABY KILLER"? If you say you would, why?
First of all, that "brother" crap is so passe cliche.
It is the duty of a soldier to report to his superiors war crimes that are being committed. It was Kerry's
duty to report to Congress what he'd learned from interviewing other vets. Again, he didn't say every veteran was guilty, he testified as to what he'd learned from other vets.
many Vietnam veterans and POW's feel that Kerry's VVAW lies and actions cost American lives and prolonged the war.
That isn't even logical. The testimony sped up the removal of troops from SE Asia. Logic dictates that the longer troops are in country, more die. Ergo, the sooner they are removed, the less die. Kinda like economics 101.
His actions and lies about Winter Soldier investigations and the VVAW activities contributed to the death of an estimated 2.5-3.5 MILLION people that were killed by the Viet Cong after we withdrew from SE Asia.
Talk about massive speculative hyperbole. I'm sure you have credible evidence to support that Kerry's testimony before Congress resulted in millions of deaths in SE Asia. :rolleyes:
Any objective student history would see it was obvious that Johnson did more to make a difficult Vietnam situation much worse and demoralize troops and the nation than Nixon did
I made no distinction between the two, and personally feel that they were both equally corrupt and damaging to America. Wait a minute, wasn't Johnson from Texas, too? Hmmmmm.
Previous Topic
Index
