pacificnw,

You continue to play the "race card" but The truth of the matter is...

The Boldt decision affirmed the tribal right to fish "in common with".

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act provides a tribal right to conduct gambling operations "in common with".

In accord with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act a tribe may conduct an activity if the activity is permitted anywhere within the state in which the tribal land is located.

I-892 affirms that which the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act provides.

Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce said, "I only ask of the government to be treated as all other men are treated... We ask that the same law shall work alike on all men... with one sky above us and one country around us, and one government for all... that all people may be one people." and I agree.

I-892 provides for "equal rights" not "special rights".

That is why I and most concerned citizens will vote YES on the initiative.

I-892 will "level this playing field."
_________________________
Why are "wild fish" made of meat?