at some point prior? Gee thats swell...the Germans used mustatrd gas in ww1 I guess we should invade them too?

Only an idiot wrould assert that there were no wmds? Your admin has admitted there were probably no wmds. Are you calling Shrub an idiot? I couldnt agree with you more, he is an idiot!

''Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there,'' Bush said, referring to the central rationale cited for the invasion of Iraq. "

http://www.csm.ornl.gov/PR/PR2004/NS-07-12-04.html

http://www.sundayherald.com/33628

http://english.people.com.cn/200410/07/eng20041007_159245.html

Could you provide a link to the ten reasonhe gave congress? I couldnt find it ....and i spent some time looking. All I fund was this....

First, that the Iraqi army would instantly collapse as soon as U.S. forces crossed their border in a "cakewalk."
Second, that Ahmed Chalabi, now charged by our own puppet Iraqi government with money laundering and counterfeiting, would quickly emerge as the popular natural leader of Iraq once President Saddam Hussein was toppled.

Third, that because no serious anti-American guerrilla operations could ever get established Iraq, only a small number of U.S. troops would have to remain after the fall of Saddam.

Fourth, that strong links between Saddam and al-Qaida would be found following our occupation.

Fifth, that overwhelming evidence of weapons of mass destruction would quickly be uncovered by U.S. troops.

Sixth, that the U.S. occupation of Iraq would discredit and weaken al-Qaida throughout the Arab and wider Muslim world.

Seventh, that Iraq would quickly develop a stable democracy after the fall of Saddam.

and that sounds like a buncha liberal bush bashing to me!

seriously Id like to know the ten reasons.