Originally Posted By: VHawk
I'd agree with everything except that last part.


So you either think that girl pictured is not "bone-able" or that the internet is not a slag pile. I'll assume the "slag pile" comment. If I may expand on my assessment, please perform these simple tests. Type "free porn" in the Google search engine. See how many web sites it finds. Next type in Britanny Spears. See how many web sites that search produces. Next, type in one of the names of the girls you mentioned. Compare the number of web sites using the girl's name to the other two searches. Next, go to eBay and put your favorite color into the search. See how many of the items you would actually buy.

I wasn't saying gems do not exist on the Internet. The girls you mentioned are the rare finds. I was just saying that the majority is fluff, unentertaining or even malicious. If it's on the web and too good to be true, it usually is. If it isn't, it will have a physical manifestation that reflects it's web persona which can be verified by personal contact.

Stepping off my soapbox...
_________________________
When at first you don't succeed, blame your parents and accept defeat...