The ODFW hasn't set a scientifically base escapement. They say 25% of the 30 year average is a healthy run. Even their biologist says that 25 % of the 30 year average is a junk number and if they were harvested down to that level the river wouldn't be healthy. They haven't made the case that the run is in good enough shape scientifically.

I think that the letter Rich posted above hits it on the head with respect to more of the junk data and being ignored.

Having Bad data isn't a reason to open up a kill fishery. Isn't it time to try something different? As a whole is the current management working? If you say yes you aren't paying attention. Maybe give maximum recreation a chance not maximum harvest.

JJ