If all the liberals left, you'd lose 70% of the tax base, and only about 20% of the welfare payouts...

I know it's not fun to do stuff like this...inject facts into retarded Republican arguments...but look it up yourself. It's not like it's a secret, or hard to find...

Is that really a fact Todd, or is it just some stupid drivel that you think you understand, but don't? Are you basing this on where welfare recipients live, or do you really have a study that shows conservatives really take more than they spend? I would like to see it. Is it possible that the actual welfare cases are all liberals, in all states? I doubt that is the case, but is it possible? I mean, wow, liberals pay 70% of the taxes. And conservatives get 80% of the welfare? You say these are facts, so I want the source. I really am surprised that you have them, since it never asked on my tax returns if I was a liberal or a conserative. More and more you show what an idiot you are. Yes idiot. And I am still waiting for your source for news, the National Enquirer, to come up with the proof of the Palin affair, which you were so sure was coming.
I also bet you, as a great liberal lawyer, are one of those great ones that found a right to privacy in Row vs. Wade, ignoring the father, the doctor and the baby. Yes baby, since abortions were at times legally allowed up the day before birth. Don't try to argue the merits of abortion with me, just tell me if you really believe that Row Vs. Wade was a good, fundamentally sound case. This, in a country were prostitution, drug use, homosexual acts, laws against gay marriage, all can be legally outlawed under the same constitution.
I asked you a while back for some enviromental changes/laws that you think Gregiore has implicated that Rossi would get rid of or some laws she will enact that he won't. Though you went on and on about how great she was and how bad he was, you didn't bother. Why not. Maybe because it is easier to shout down other people about how smart you are and how dumb they are and then run away? I am still waiting for you to come up with one solid fact.
Don't say that because Rossi is backed by the building industry proves he will destroy the enviroment, just give me an example. Couldn't I just as easily say that since Gregiore took money from the tribes she will expand on netting and Rossi will make it all better? No need for facts, just innuendo should be enough right?
I know it's not fun to do stuff like this...inject facts into retarded Republican arguments......