maybe... but it beats the heck out of drinking the 'collapse by fire' kool aid.

btw, did you know that the manufacture of nanothermite is strictly controlled and traceable? Did you know that the manufacture of nanothermite post-dates the building of the WTC complex and can be ruled out as having been used in the buildings construction?

I'm hearing that the next paper will detail the time and place of manufacture of this explosive. Hopefully this will lead to a perfectly reasonable explanation for there being a substance in the WTC dust whose sole known purpose is in explosive weaponry....

....few will even read these reports. Most will continue to look away or cry 'conspiracy' while attacking the messenger.

While debating fishing politics endlessly on the 'bright side' have we learned anything at all about the side of an argument who uses such tactics? I mean, we've even had a self-desribed 'expert' come in here and attack, not the arguments whose premises he should be able to so easily brush aside, but the messenger. This folks is fear in action and the very reaction those perpetrating the crime knew would come.

So while the peanut gallery continues to jump in and chide me for being a kook (....and much worse!!)I continue to strengthen my case unchallenged by argument. Discourse v. red-faced handwaving.....this is a clue people.

Just so the argument remains clearly focused, I'll repeat...'nanothermite found in the WTC dust undermines the official story, collapse by fire, while strengthening the 'controlled demolition' theory.'