the truth is bludgeoning you

so far in this thread no one has brought forth an alternative explanation as to how weapons grade nanothermite wound up in the wtc debris.

when asked 'how could they....?' I provide scenarios backed by evidence and instead of a rebuttals I get attacks.

lots of people attacking me, but not the evidence.

judging by the content of this board recently it would be easiest to chalk this up to pure stupidity but I know better....

....the rest of you are just plain chicken to have a REAL debate on this subject.

Intellectual pussies, to wo/man

Yes, that's right I'm resorting to namecalling. Much like the Professor calling McFly a chicken to spur him to action. If you poked your head in here to make fun, you are a pussy. If you failed to educate yourself on the subjects arising from the presentation of this evidence, you are a pussy.

Consider that my 'counter-attack'.

Here's your chance to redeem yourself. See if you can attack my position without attacking me. See if you can contribute to the conversation without heckling from the peanut gallery. See if you can keep your emotions in check long enough to apply critical thinking skills to this discussion.

Truly, I have my doubts. I have the over/under on number of replies it takes to receive an attack at 2......any takers on the over?