Originally Posted By: blue water pro
So you are saying the kid was a mini-sadam (even though he was an American) or a future Charles Manson - that is rather presumptuous - don't ya think? For all you know he was a future scientist who might have cured cancer. We Will NEVER know what he was to be.


Too bad I had the computer off....missed some of the non-sense.

How do you get to the point of "me saying" from what I posted? You are the one assuming, not I. Your proclamation was that it is ALWAYS bad when a 17 year old dies. My point was that by saying that you ASSUME that 17 is the only requirement to being a worthwhile individual. My point was that ALL people.....good and bad......are seventeen at one time (provided they live longer than that). Trevon was not exactly your roll model teen, was he? Kicked out of school, doing drugs, stealing,..........not a good start. Does that make him future cell bait? No, but it makes him more prone to be.
In this case this boogle could have been a zoogle, also may not have been a zoogle. One thing is for sure....this boogle bungled it.
_________________________
Agendas kill truth.
If it's a crop, plant it.