I just wanted to bounce this off some of you. The Fish & Wildlife Commission is either making rule changes or proposing rule changes (not sure which) and I can't decide if I agree or not.

Here's the one I'm most skeptical about:

"An advanced hunter education rule that would increase penalties for master hunters found guilty of violating hunting rules."

Now, in theory an someone who has achieved their "master hunter" status should know the rules pretty well and should set a good example. For the most part I would agree with this but there is still a part of me that says shouldn't the punishment fit the crime and not the person? Shouldn't anyone who breaks the rules get the same punishment? I know this isn't always the case (i.e. Winona Ryder, OJ, etc.) but shouldn't it be?

I'm kind of riding the fence on this and would like to hear arguments either way.