I should have said that you have a hard time comprehending the written word. Did you read the 2 articles you posted? The 1st stated that grass fed beef was different from grain fed.
The second study does not speak about grass fed at all. So a rational person can see that grass fed is different and that the second study you cite does not discuss it as a prduct. If you continue to search you will see pretty clear evidence that grass fed cattle is ultra low in fat. Lower than your grain fed chicken, depending on the cut. It has elevated omega 3's and many other health benefits.
I don't eat it daily, but if I did I would likely outlast you, if for no other reason than you are overdue to win a Darwin award.
Go Sox,
cds
If Doctor Rick were here, I think he would be agreeing with you and not RH on the grass fed beef. Corp America has done a thorough job in "altering" what our government claims is a healthy diet and what constitutes "good for you".
There's no way you can feed 7 billion people a truly "healthy diet". Cheap grain based carbohydrates are being used to substitute healthy proteins, fruits and vegetables to keep all these humans alive.
However, I think people that subscribe to a strict "Paleo" diet are missing out. We now know that even Neanderthal ate some grains. Grains weren't widely available to the hunter/gatherer societies, but when found, they were harvested, probably because they were "portable" and could be used at a later time. Fruits, vegetables and meats needed to be consumed fresh.