I don't understand......

Are the ballot measure to ban gill nets and the Gov's proposal mutually exclusive, or not?

If the gill net ban passes, and becomes law, how would this affect the Gov's proposal? Seems like major parts of his proposal would be dead, since gill nets would not be allowed even in the SAFE areas (as I understand it). So the "carrot and stick approach" becomes just a stick.
So I'm not sure the Commission or ODFW or the Gov could LEGALLY support much of the Gov's proposal if the people of Oregon (thru the ballot box) ban gill nets entirely from the Lower C.

However, if the Oregon ballot measure to ban gill nets FAILS, my sense is the Commission will toss the Gov's proposal into the recycling bin. And the Gov won't complain. After all, if the people of Oregon fail to ban gill nets in the lower Columbia, why should the Gov, the Commission, or ODFW support it? Thus, my confusion.

Perhaps someone who knows both the gill net ban petition and the Gov's proposal can provide some additional discussion.