Originally Posted By: SBD
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/08/gill-netting_ban_would_hurt_co.html


Wouldn't worry about money either I'm guessing someone will just run a bigger check across town in Vancouver to keep the ballot measure going. These people have already spent 25 million plus down here whats a few million more.


Looking at the headline I thought that there was going to be an explanation, but not one word devoted to the headline. Just like Todd unable to prove his point because he can’t.

This is 1935 all over again, when the gillnetters compared the vast amount of fish each fish trap caught VS a gill net. Now of course that would be a true statement until they strung 1500 miles of gillnet up and down the river. Now they are trying to pull the same wool over the Oregon voter by saying a switch of gear will not help fish without conclusive proof.

Nice try but no cigar.
_________________________
The world will not be destroyed by those that are evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.- Albert Einstein

No you can’t have my rights---I’m still using them