I appreciate the efforts, but a ban on gillnets and a plan by the Governor to save gillnets from being banned are not even close to being in the same ball park.

After all the reading I've done, the interviews I've heard, and the various reasons given by dozens of folks on all the different websites (all different reasons, too, mind you), I still have no idea exactly what the CCA was thinking by abandoning 81 and supporting a plan (Safe for Salmon) that they weren't supporting all along because it...drum roll...used gillnets.

You cannot, no matter how much you twist it, support 81 and the Governor's plan.

Fish on...

Todd