Another aspect for consideration is that a number of proposed rule changes pertaining to the Strait and MA 4 were given a preliminary thumbs down by Staff (that is, not recommended for further review) because there was inadequate data available. Staff comments also referenced ongoing studies to determine effectiveness of existing protections.

So, how is there insufficient data to support some proposed rule changes but apparently sufficient data (but not provided by Staff) to not only recommend other rule changes for further consideration but for the Commission to actually implement them?

Arbitrary and capricious?


Edited by Larry B (03/09/13 05:07 PM)
Edit Reason: spelling
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!

It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)