I am happy to write letters on this, but would like a few facts first. I was at the commission meeting on Thursday but not Friday. Did something happen after noon on thursday that was public?

I'd appreciate facts not somebody in SF said something that could be construed as hurting one of the commissioners feelings, but we can't tell you who said it or who's feelings might have suffered.

I'm sure all manner of backroom pressure has been and will continue to be applied on WB managment. I have a hard time writing letters based on internet conjecture.

While some may be shocked that WB managment might have historically (and even presently) be predicated on half truths and outright falsehoods, I would be more shocked if it started to be managed on the basis of facts, data, and sound scientific principles.