Should add here:

People have almost diametrically opposed beliefs on this subject, and the reason why is it is such a serious issue...more than serious, in fact.

It is not an issue you can just glibly toss out a response to off the top of your head. It requires the type of thinking that many Americans have abandoned, that being taking an issue deep down in your gut and having a serious, honest chat with yourself about it.

Mr. Garcia poses the question: "At what point does "fetal tissue" become a baby?"

"Fetal Tissue" IS a baby. The term "fetal tissue" is used with an intent on reducing the humanity associated with killing a baby...doesn't sound like a real life when it's called fetal tissue.

That baby wants to live, which is why they are fighting each day to develop their organs to a point where they can come out and see the world.

The only voice they have is that of their mother, but then if she is so selfish and caught up in herself she only wants her freedom back...at any cost, she has been given the legal right to murder her unborn baby. I can only imagine the mental anguish they must feel when their baby is now dead by their hand, but then rationalize their way around it by calling it "fetal tissue". IMO the woman is just as guilty of murder as the doc who technically performs the murder.

Baby killers always like to toss in the plot complication of "what if it is incest or rape"? As horribly evil and unfortunate as it is, a life is still a life.