#1057014 - 09/06/21 11:13 PM
Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
|
Fry
Registered: 11/24/10
Posts: 23
Loc: Raymond
|
Just saw this on the Moldy Chum blog. Apparently this video has the Addicted Fishing guys catching pink after pink in the Dosewallips River, which is closed to salmon fishing during the summer. I assume to protect the ESA summer chum. https://www.moldychum.com/targeting-pinks-in-the-dosewallips-is-unlawful/Here is the video, which anyone that has fished the Dosewallips, can tell exactly where they are fishing. https://youtu.be/t0TwU4k-gUs"According to the crew at Addicted Fishing, this might be the best video they’ve ever made. Well, they might want to rethink that description. The unnamed “NEW” creek in this video is the Dosewallips, which flows into Hood Canal and is closed to all salmon fishing. Anyone who fishes the Dosie for trout is familiar with the highlighted stretch of river from the campground up to and beyond the powerlines. Bad enough being a Washington-based fishing media company and not checking the regs, even worse documenting and sharing 18+ wildlife violations with your 229K subscribers and wildlife officials."
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057021 - 09/07/21 07:30 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 09/07/09
Posts: 194
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057030 - 09/07/21 09:30 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 08/02/12
Posts: 1052
Loc: In a drift boat...
|
MULITPLE 20 POUNDERS BRO!
_________________________
YOUR MOTHER IS A TULE!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057043 - 09/07/21 02:12 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: Jake Dogfish]
|
Fry
Registered: 11/24/10
Posts: 23
Loc: Raymond
|
I guess that's fair, but why did they take the video down then? Addicted would never pull a video with 40k+ views and what they call their best video yet. Video is now a dead link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0TwU4k-gUsJust saying...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057044 - 09/07/21 02:23 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 08/02/12
Posts: 1052
Loc: In a drift boat...
|
Honest question
Who cares?
_________________________
YOUR MOTHER IS A TULE!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057046 - 09/07/21 03:39 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 08/02/12
Posts: 1052
Loc: In a drift boat...
|
I was referring to your obsession with them. Can't recall ever wanting to watch their videos let alone making a post about them.
_________________________
YOUR MOTHER IS A TULE!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057048 - 09/07/21 04:57 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6825
|
odd how i made a comment on the video about the river not open to salmon fishing until Nov 1st and they deleted the video...
Martin, Jordan, Valerie and all the other morons from that place are only in the fishing industry for 1 reason, to rape the resource and make money...
plain and simple..
WP, some of us grew up fishing that river, so we kinda hold it in a special place is all...
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057050 - 09/07/21 06:00 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
My Waders are Moist
Registered: 11/20/08
Posts: 3440
Loc: PNW
|
This is a bad look for them.
Makes you wonder about other videos of theirs…..
_________________________
Maybe he's born with it.
Maybe it's amphetamines.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057051 - 09/07/21 06:26 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6825
|
They sell their gear at Walmart now so...
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057053 - 09/07/21 09:15 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 5 * General Evo]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 08/02/12
Posts: 1052
Loc: In a drift boat...
|
odd how i made a comment on the video about the river not open to salmon fishing until Nov 1st and they deleted the video...
Martin, Jordan, Valerie and all the other morons from that place are only in the fishing industry for 1 reason, to rape the resource and make money...
plain and simple..
WP, some of us grew up fishing that river, so we kinda hold it in a special place is all... Fair enough.
_________________________
YOUR MOTHER IS A TULE!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057144 - 09/08/21 08:03 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 09/27/08
Posts: 340
Loc: SWWA
|
Too bad most fishermen don’t get out and make their own adventures, much rather sit at home and watch someone else have the fun. I don’t watch many fishing videos, except tutorials and I don’t follow them cuz I’m out there fishin.
If they’re fishing in closed waters they should get their nuts nailed to the wall.
Edited by Misguided (09/08/21 08:04 PM)
_________________________
I Brake for Salmon & Steelhead!!!!!
2nd Generation Army Veteran and Damn Proud of it.
Misguided was the name of my 1st drift boat, I am not to be associated with LAWLESSNESS!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057185 - 09/09/21 10:36 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/03
Posts: 783
|
100% in closed waters to be targeting salmon, which they make quite clear that's their intent. Couple that with continuing to not abide by the fish handling rule on WA streams(they break that one in every WA based video)...
I especially like the part where he talks about killing a coho, which isn't allowed in ANY of those rivers south of the quil....at any time of the year! Pretty sad that this is the kinda [Bleeeeep!] we have gotten used to from them.
And fuuuuuuuuauuuck the people that brought them there!
_________________________
Fish gills are like diesel engines, don't run them out of fuel!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1057331 - 09/11/21 05:00 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 09/27/08
Posts: 340
Loc: SWWA
|
Bookface, Twither and Instergrams SUCK BALLS.
_________________________
I Brake for Salmon & Steelhead!!!!!
2nd Generation Army Veteran and Damn Proud of it.
Misguided was the name of my 1st drift boat, I am not to be associated with LAWLESSNESS!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059440 - 04/07/22 01:26 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6825
|
if they were targeting trout, why did he say if it was a hatchery coho or king he was going to BBQ it?
there is no hatchery on that river anywhere..
nice lie, try again...
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059445 - 04/07/22 02:40 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Smolt
Registered: 06/11/21
Posts: 82
|
There is no such thing as wild fish anymore. Their all hatchery fish bro. Probably strays from the Hoodsport hatchery.
_________________________
Go Pro? Let’s Goooo!!! Follow me on Instagram @fishpr0her0
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059449 - 04/07/22 04:37 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
bobrr
Unregistered
|
More dark side prospects (if that still existed).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059450 - 04/07/22 08:53 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: ]
|
Dah Rivah Stinkah Pink Mastah
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 6866
Loc: zipper
|
Q: Does 30 years of boat payments make someone a mod? A: LOL
_________________________
... Propping up an obsolete fishing industry at the expense of sound fisheries management is irresponsible. -Sg
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059451 - 04/07/22 09:13 PM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: GoPro Hero]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/08
Posts: 506
|
There is no such thing as wild fish anymore. Their all hatchery fish bro. Probably strays from the Hoodsport hatchery. I'm afraid that you have it backwards bro. The Hoodsport hatchery population was derived from wild fish from the Dungeness and Dosewallips Rivers in 1953. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-NWFSC-25..., February 1996
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059453 - 04/08/22 06:45 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
Any fish that is spawned in the wild is a wild fish. Native fish are wild fish that evolved in that system. We have plenty of wild fish, but few native.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059456 - 04/08/22 07:50 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: seabeckraised]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4394
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
|
There are some native runs around. Chehalis Springers are one and some late Coho in certain streams.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059461 - 04/08/22 09:48 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: seabeckraised]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4394
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
|
Not in recent times but not sure about way back. Lots of things went on last century and example is 5 million Fall Chinook eggs transferred from old Schafer Park hatchery to upper Chehalis Hatchery and they perished when the hatchery had a problem. So this, normal timed Coho, Chum, and Fall Chinook have had stocks moved all over and it is the smaller runs like Springers and Late Coho that remained untouched. The Bingham Late Coho are not the same as the native late Coho that used to be mostly late Dec and Jan returning fish. You just about have to be an historian to track this stuff.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059463 - 04/08/22 10:23 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: Rivrguy]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 05/12/21
Posts: 231
Loc: Mason County
|
Not in recent times but not sure about way back. Lots of things went on last century and example is 5 million Fall Chinook eggs transferred from old Schafer Park hatchery to upper Chehalis Hatchery and they perished when the hatchery had a problem. So this, normal timed Coho, Chum, and Fall Chinook have had stocks moved all over and it is the smaller runs like Springers and Late Coho that remained untouched. The Bingham Late Coho are not the same as the native late Coho that used to be mostly late Dec and Jan returning fish. You just about have to be an historian to track this stuff. Tell me about it. Coming in to a lot of this knowledge over the last couple years I feel I feel in over my head. Trying to soak up as much as possible especially for the Grays Harbor region. Seems like every day I find new historical records. That said, feel free to PM me any historical papers you feel like sharing.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059465 - 04/08/22 11:36 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
Also, just because hatchery fish were stocked in watershed, or strays there, does not (necessarily) mean the native genome was changed. Selection weeds out the maladapted. Except in humans, where we elect them.
I and reading about a 40 year study the Grants did on Galapagos Finches on on tiny island. Lots happened over 40 years. New species were evened, hybridization, and so on. One finding, though, was that one species present in year 40 was demonstrably different from what it was in year 0. Natural processes, including evolution, changed them.
I suspect that the only place where you might have the same native fish as you had 200 years ago is in a watershed untouched by humans or natural change in climate.
Life out there is a heck of a lot more complex and varied than we want to believe.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1059476 - 04/09/22 09:57 AM
Re: Targeting pinks in Dosewallips is illegal
[Re: 32mm]
|
Smolt
Registered: 06/11/21
Posts: 82
|
There is a lot of even year pinks that return their. I could probably score some killer footage there this year bro!
_________________________
Go Pro? Let’s Goooo!!! Follow me on Instagram @fishpr0her0
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
939
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11498 Members
16 Forums
63773 Topics
645302 Posts
Max Online: 3001 @ 01/28/20 02:48 PM
|
|
|