Check

 

Defiance Boats!

LURECHARGE!

THE PP OUTDOOR FORUMS

Kast Gear!

Power Pro Shimano Reels G Loomis Rods

  Willie boats! Puffballs!

 

Three Rivers Marine

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#1060816 - 10/29/22 11:01 AM Surplus Hatchery Fish
seabeckraised Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 05/12/21
Posts: 231
Loc: Mason County
I’m sure there’s several members of this board with knowledge of this, but what happens to the surplus hatchery fish after escapement goals are met? I’m aware of carcass distribution on many watersheds, and even the recycling of some steelhead for additional sport opportunity. I can’t imagine they utilize 100% of the surplus for these methods,so what else do they do with them? Sell to dog/cat food producers, fertilizer producers? Food banks?

(This isn’t me complaining about 15k+ at Bingham. Just a random curiosity.)


Edited by seabeckraised (10/29/22 11:03 AM)

Top
#1060817 - 10/29/22 11:09 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
steely slammer Offline
Three Time Spawner

Registered: 02/24/00
Posts: 1526
dog food cat food fertilizer the whole works..
_________________________
Where Destroying Fishing in Washington..

mainly region 6

Top
#1060818 - 10/29/22 12:51 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Rivrguy Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4394
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
WDFW has a contract that is open to bids and the contractor is required to take all carcasses regardless of condition from all WDFW facilities. A fish that has been opened ( spawned by cutting them open ) at the facility or is a mortality ( died for some reason ) is not allowed for human consumption.

The fish have many uses from eggs for cheap caviar, bait manufacturers, to fish by products. Very few salmon get recycled or carcasses put out in watersheds. WDFW does not (or did not) get the funds generated but rather the $$$$ go too the volunteer programs.

One of the slams on hatcheries is the "surplus" that commercials and Recs scream are wasted. Facts are that you damn well better have a surplus in mixed H&W stock watersheds such as the Chehalis because you manage to the WILD escapement not the minimum hatchery needs which is only a fraction of the need of wild salmon escapement.

That 15k are at Bingham this early is unusual with the current flows. That 15k is about the fish coming in very early in huge numbers and getting up above the NT and QIN commercials. What surprises me is that the jack count is about half of last year but on the river there were a lot of jacks.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in

Top
#1060820 - 10/29/22 01:42 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Krijack Offline
Three Time Spawner

Registered: 06/03/06
Posts: 1531
Loc: Tacoma
Take a look at the Skokomish hatchery. Over 26000 to the hatchery. I believe the number was higher than the entire ocean Recreational chinook quota. This after there is a tribal and non-tribal fishery targeting them. At times it truely is a waste.

Top
#1060821 - 10/29/22 03:01 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
seabeckraised Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 05/12/21
Posts: 231
Loc: Mason County
Interesting. Figured it was something like that.

Really bummed to have missed out on those Jacks this year. Suppose I could’ve tried going after them in the Chehalis, but I loaded up on quite a few last year on the tribs.

Top
#1060822 - 10/29/22 04:59 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Rivrguy Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4394
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
jacks are still present and will be until flows jump which may be Monday.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in

Top
#1060823 - 10/29/22 07:27 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
deadly Offline
Fry

Registered: 04/15/12
Posts: 34
The carcasses should have to go back into the river to feed the system, does anyone stop to think that the massive amount of nutrients that used to feed the river ecosystem is now shipped off to who the hell knows and maybe thats why fish populations are dropping?

And if not that, then anyone with a valid license should be able to go to a hatchery that has received they're qouta and get 2 fish, especially the skokomish.

Top
#1060824 - 10/29/22 08:03 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
fish4brains Offline
Dah Rivah Stinkah Pink Mastah

Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 6866
Loc: zipper
riverbanks, gravel bars, and low hanging branches used to be loaded with rotting salmon after a high water. Not any more.
_________________________
...
Propping up an obsolete fishing industry at the expense of sound fisheries management is irresponsible. -Sg



Top
#1060826 - 10/30/22 06:14 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: deadly]
Rivrguy Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4394
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
We did that on the Satsop, carcasses that is. It is a whole lot harder than you make it out. You first cannot jump watersheds, disease protocols, need to mark the carcasses by cutting the tail off, and transport them to preapproved locations and place them in the streams.

It can be done but it is labor intensive and a little spendy. For WDFW to do it I would be afraid to see the cost with the union contract and purchasing requirements.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in

Top
#1060832 - 10/30/22 10:35 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
As Rivrguy noted, putting those carcasses out is very labor intensive. Plus, of course, you need access to the stream(s). The disease protocols are a major constraint.

The other piece is that all the carcasses that come back to all the hatcheries are (maybe) enough for one river system. We are in that big of a hole.

Further, our Legislature has mandated where some of the fish go; there are all sorts of rules about what can be done with them.

Top
#1060833 - 10/30/22 11:19 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
FleaFlickr02 Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 3314
Those who know me know I'm in the not enough rotting salmon crowd. I think those marine-derived nutrients are (or were) a critical piece of the puzzle, for both anadromous and resident populations.

As a person who does a lot of fly fishing, I have come to understand that our (mostly) glacial streams have much lower aquatic insect populations than, say, Rocky Mountain streams, and as a result, resident (and burgeoning anadromous) fish have relatively little insect forage. That means growing fish depend on "other" food sources, most notably the fry and fingerlings of other (or the same!) species, supplemented by the rotting carcasses of their parent generations. Deprive a system of those critical nutrients, and it translates to less food for burgeoning populations. The result can only be increased predation on smaller fish, which in turn reduces the fry and smolt populations of all species. Not hard to imagine how that would be a recipe for decline over time.

The solution (increase escapement goals) is maddeningly simple, yet at the same time, it is prohibitively complex. Bad situation, both for fish and the anglers who seek them.

Top
#1060834 - 10/30/22 11:26 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
20 Gage Offline
Returning Adult

Registered: 02/15/21
Posts: 313
- putting those carcasses out is very labor intensive.

- Plus, of course, you need access to the stream(s).

- The disease protocols are a major constraint.

- The other piece is that all the carcasses that come back to all the hatcheries are (maybe) enough for one river system. We are in that big of a hole.

- Further, our Legislature has mandated where some of the fish go;

Always the insurmountable excuses, with the last one so strongly based in science, no wonder the return numbers tank...

Top
#1060835 - 10/30/22 11:43 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
FleaFlickr02 Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 3314
One clarification: my proposal is to increase WILD escapement. Wild fish aren't as prone to disease, etc., so they are much safer (and more economical; indeed, FREE!).

Wild fish are the key. I think our years of hatchery production have been enough to teach us that hatcheries don't assure survival for the cloned species. They're just there to be caught, ideally for profit.

Top
#1060836 - 10/30/22 12:05 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: 20 Gage]
SpoonFed Offline
Three Time Spawner

Registered: 01/29/19
Posts: 1519
Originally Posted By: 20 Gage
- putting those carcasses out is very labor intensive.

- Plus, of course, you need access to the stream(s).

- The disease protocols are a major constraint.

- The other piece is that all the carcasses that come back to all the hatcheries are (maybe) enough for one river system. We are in that big of a hole.

- Further, our Legislature has mandated where some of the fish go;

Always the insurmountable excuses, with the last one so strongly based in science, no wonder the return numbers tank...
indeed. The state can get access just about wherever they need if conservation is concerned. Ive watched the nutrient enhancement in person and its not much more labor intensive than planting trout out of a bag chute. Is disease protocol an issue with the fish that spawn outside the hatcheries, die on the banks, cook a few days on said bank, then get washed back in with a high water.

Top
#1060837 - 10/30/22 01:24 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
Access is not being able to just get to the stream, it is getting to all of it. Just because bridges cross every mile or so doesn't mean you can get to the creek. Mounds of carcasses are not exactly a good way to get nutrients in.

Wild fish are just as prone to move bugs around. One of the reasons why there is a an effort to keep any and all anadromous fish out of hatchery water supplies is to keep bugs out.

We should be increasing wild escapement by leaps and bounds. That would be the simplest solution to getting nutrients into the system.

And wild fish are in now way free. One must protect the habitat which means reduce/eliminate water withdrawals, stream side logging, stream side ag, and so on. Plus, a hatchery is simply more efficient at converting water to fish. The complex of hatcheries in Hood Canal produces way more chum salmon for about 100 or 200 cfs. It produced more chum than any of the major river systems. While part of that was poor escapement goals there is the efficiency piece.

Top
#1060839 - 10/30/22 03:23 PM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
FleaFlickr02 Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 3314
Right. Wild fish are only free for those who don't have to give up property/mineral/water rights to provide more spawning habitat. Harvest is where we have the most immediate leverage, but yeah....

Top
#1060868 - 11/05/22 07:43 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
It is not just the individual property (private) owner but the public at large. Aren't allowed too dredge rivers, all the development restrictions, and so on apply tp public lands so all of us pay for those "free" fish.

Top
#1060869 - 11/05/22 07:51 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: seabeckraised]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
Although I believe that the Fraser sockeye management up to the 80s was probably the best salmon management on the coast they did (purposefully) over harvest some minor stocks to obtain full use of the major ones. This could change as Canada seems to want to shift sockeye (and maybe all salmonids) harvest to the FN fisheries which tend to be in-river and can be more surgical in removing just the target stock.

Even if we had no hatchery stocks (or no wild stocks) there would still be the need for differential harvest rates which could result in surpluses at some locations.

Top
#1060870 - 11/05/22 08:33 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: Carcassman]
RUNnGUN Offline
Repeat Spawner

Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 1382
Originally Posted By: Carcassman
This could change as Canada seems to want to shift sockeye (and maybe all salmonids) harvest to the FN fisheries which tend to be in-river and can be more surgical in removing just the target stock.

Interesting. Is that in our future?
_________________________
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.” – Ferris Bueller.
Don't let the old man in!

Top
#1060871 - 11/05/22 10:11 AM Re: Surplus Hatchery Fish [Re: Carcassman]
seabeckraised Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 05/12/21
Posts: 231
Loc: Mason County
Originally Posted By: Carcassman
Although I believe that the Fraser sockeye management up to the 80s was probably the best salmon management on the coast they did (purposefully) over harvest some minor stocks to obtain full use of the major ones. This could change as Canada seems to want to shift sockeye (and maybe all salmonids) harvest to the FN fisheries which tend to be in-river and can be more surgical in removing just the target stock.

Even if we had no hatchery stocks (or no wild stocks) there would still be the need for differential harvest rates which could result in surpluses at some locations.


FN Fisheries as in First Nations I’m guessing? Seems like a more precise method of targeting versus ocean mixed-stock.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Search

Site Links
Home
Our Washington Fishing
Our Alaska Fishing
Reports
Rates
Contact Us
About Us
Recipes
Photos / Videos
Visit us on Facebook
Today's Birthdays
CHUBS
Recent Gallery Pix
hatchery steelhead
Hatchery Releases into the Pacific and Harvest
Who's Online
0 registered (), 939 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
John Boob, Lawrence, I'm Still RichG, feyt, Freezeout
11498 Registered Users
Top Posters
Todd 28170
Dan S. 17149
Sol Duc 16138
The Moderator 14486
Salmo g. 13521
eyeFISH 12766
STRIKE ZONE 12107
Dogfish 10979
ParaLeaks 10513
Jerry Garcia 9160
Forum Stats
11498 Members
16 Forums
63773 Topics
645302 Posts

Max Online: 3001 @ 01/28/20 02:48 PM

Join the PP forums.

It's quick, easy, and always free!

Working for the fish and our future fishing opportunities:

The Wild Steelhead Coalition

The Photo & Video Gallery. Nearly 1200 images from our fishing trips! Tips, techniques, live weight calculator & more in the Fishing Resource Center. The time is now to get prime dates for 2018 Olympic Peninsula Winter Steelhead , don't miss out!.

| HOME | ALASKA FISHING | WASHINGTON FISHING | RIVER REPORTS | FORUMS | FISHING RESOURCE CENTER | CHARTER RATES | CONTACT US | WHAT ABOUT BOB? | PHOTO & VIDEO GALLERY | LEARN ABOUT THE FISH | RECIPES | SITE HELP & FAQ |