As posted by BillyBob on another thread

For all of you that thought Bush said he was offering amnesty, he distinctly said he opposed amnesty. Here's what he said:

"Tonight I also ask you to reform our immigration laws, so they reflect our values and benefit our economy. I propose a new temporary worker program to match willing foreign workers with willing employers, when no Americans can be found to fill the job. This reform will be good for our economy -- because employers will find needed workers in an honest and orderly system. A temporary worker program will help protect our homeland -- allowing border patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security. I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.


Here's a link to the entire text.

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/01/20/sotu_speech/

I think Kerry made a very credible showing in Iowa and seems to be a middle of the road Democrat who is not week on defense. I had to laugh when the commentators on "hardball-MSNBC" called Dean's speech on Tuesday, following the calling of the votes, the worst since Dan Quail. Dean will definitely not get my vote, but one thing Iowa showed is that candidates reveal themselves through this process and it doesn't hurt to wait before zeroing in on a candidate.

I haven't even come close to making up my mind yet, though I'm kind of leaning towards either Kerry or Dean.

I'd never vote for Bush...or anyone else who, in the name of defending our "way of life", will take away right after right, and then call me and encourage all the rest of the warhawks in the country to call me "unpatriotic" for not buying into it.

This is the extent of my talking Presidential politics on this BB, so don't bother trying to get me to keep talking about it. I've got e-mail if anyone has any comments to make.

Fish on...

Todd.

How many of the liberals here work for city, county, state, federal govts or are lawyers or college students?

What, exactly has he lied about? We've found no evidence at all that Saddam destroyed the weapons. The bottom line is that nothing can simply cease to exist. If he had weapons in 1998, they still exist in some form or another. No proof or evidence has been shown that they were destroyed, and since it was up to the Iraqi government to prove the weapons were destroyed, President Bush's actions were totally justified. Either the weapons are hidden, given to a different country, or destroyed. IMO, it's least likely that they were destroyed. All Saddam would have had to do to avoid the war would be to show where the weapons were destroyed and the inspectors could have verified if they were or not.

Thanks for posting that link, Jerry.

Here's the part that I don't like: ...match willing foreign workers with willing employers, when no Americans can be found to fill the job.

There's currently over 2 million documented unemployed Americans, and Lord only knows how many have simply given up trying to find a job. As long as illegal immigrants are competing for those jobs at significantly lower wages, legal Americans don't have a chance. Granted, some of them need to be forced to take those jobs, but as long as all the illegals are here, it's too easy to justify staying unemployed and keep sucking up the unemployment checks.

Gharley,

We have the lowest cost food of any developed nation in the world. Are you willing to pay 4 or 5 times what you do now for dinner?

Use Garlic as an example. Some 90% of the Garlic consumed in the US was grown in Calif. Calif started raising the minimum wage a few years ago. Now 95% of garlic consumed in the US comes from China. We vote every day for unemployment with your pocket book and scream bloody murder if our restaurant tab goes up. I think it is a bit short sighted to blame one administration. Ever shop at Walmart, Target? You are voting with your check book to send jobs to China, Mexico etc. How about buying clothes. Look at all the labels in your closet or drawers and tell me how many made in America labels are there. Less than 5%. The only way to keep employment is to pay more for the things we buy to keep manufacturing at home. Have you been doing your part 100% of the time or do you want a low cost of living and blame Bush for the consequences?

Well, George Bush works for the Federal Government.......but I don't think he's a liberal.

Todd-

What rights have been taken away from you?

Papaslap

I think he may have been referring to a lot of the places we, as fisherman can no longer go in the name of security. Around dams and such....

I think a Kerry/Edwards or a Kerry/Clarke ticket would be a force to be reckoned with this coming November.

I wish we could get John McCain to change party affiliation.

Theking;

You're quite a patriotic sounding flag-waver - which makes me wonder why you put your pocketbook ahead of the lives and welfare of legal Americans. Personally, I don't mind paying a few dollars extra for something if I know America and Americans are benefiting from it. I blame this administration because it's willing to take jobs away from needy Americans.

BTW, both my wife and I are retired federal employees. In fact many of our friends and loved ones are still working for the feds in a rather large sandbox many miles to the East of here.

"Personally, I don't mind paying a few dollars extra for something "

Easy to say but does the manufacture origin tags on yours and most peoples purchased items reflect this? I doubt it making every one a part of the problem. This started long before GW and will not end with GW. What he proposes simply makes an issue more measurable. A classic case of shooting the messenger.

It sounds very similar to the H1B visa program which has been abused to offshore white collar jobs putting millions of middle class americans out of work. The H1B visa program is supposed to have the same intent...fill positions that can't be filled by an American. However, and Corporate America should be prosecuted for this abuse, when Y2K was approaching corporations whined that there weren't enough skilled tech workers pushing congress many times to raise the number of H1B visas. When Y2K passed they began downsizing American higher paid workers and training the H1B visa holders, mostly from India, in order to begin the transition overseas. H1B visas are often times slave labor because if the holder loses his job he is also booted from the country. Only this year is the number of H1B visas being lowered but it's too late. The damage/transition has been done.
First manufacturing jobs then white collar and it's not stopping at tech workers either. Accounting, tax prep, debt collection, stock analysis, anything that can be transmitted as data back and forth is going away rapidly to other countries. All on your behalf to "lower prices". Yeah right.
This new proposal does not specify "migrant farm workers" as people seem to assume. What will happen if this new proposal becomes law is that businesses will begin to post openings for any job that might not have been outsourced at rock bottom pay. When no American is willing to accept a salary which cannot cover their living expenses the business can now hire a foreign worker here in the USA. Notice there's no mention about "prevailing wage". Think you can't be replaced by a foreigner? Think again. They can hire two or three for the price of you.
One more reason not to vote for this insanity. You give this guy another four years without having to worry about re-election and you get what you deserve. Before you ask no I haven't been replaced yet but it's coming my way soon. And, I don't consider myself a liberal. I'd have voted for McCain in a heartbeat. At least the left is offering up some stop gaps like removing tax subsidies from these companies. Like that will ever happen but who knows. I say they should go further. You want to act like a foreign company then you will be treated like one.

Good Point. I try to buy American as much as I possibly can. Globalazation is going to make that an even bigger challenge than it already is. I also try to avoid purchasing products from 'American' Corporations who 'locate 'offshore to avoid Federal Income Taxes. Those same Corporations tend to export the so called 'Family Wage ' jobs overseas I have noticed. As a citizen , taxpayer. and business owner , I find that behavior appalingly un-patriotic, and encourage others to research what they buy. Globalazation could be a good thing, but as it is turning out, it would seem to be about larger profits for multi- nationals, and less about open markets and raising the standard of living in tihird world nations, as it has been presented in the past. Buy American, and make sure your friends do too. It's the right thing to do for the country, and your fellow citizens !!! (PS. Anybody but Bush, leaning towards Sharpton Grandpa :0, I think Sharpton is really Don King, Iv'e never seen them together at the same time)

The Levi Strauss company no longer has ANY manufacturing plants in the USA ....Should they have just gone bankrupt to stay "American"? All of you complainers on this thread should consider what you are saying about George Bush stealing all of the jobs from Americans....That is sophomoric and shows how shallow your thinking is and how broad your bias. Would any one of you jump in your volkswagon bus and drive to California to pick beans for $3.00 per hour? NO....Can you make a pair of jeans here and compete with all the jeans made in Malaysia and China? NO

Why is Microsoft outsourcing to India? Because of George Bush? NO....Will they stop if Howard Dean becomes president? NO

This crap brings out the worst in us here on PP. Some of you only come out for these no win debates about politics. Why not try to focus on the myriad of fishing issues staring us in the face right now.

So you make your political argument and then bash others for arguing politics?
Where did I say George Bush was responsible for all of the lost jobs? He is, however, encouraging more lost jobs. It's not about someone picking beans. That's how it is being sold to you and you choose to believe it. Jobs that can be offshored are being offshored. Jobs that can't be offshored are going to go to incoming immigrants willing to work for less under this proposal. And get this, you will be training them to replace you.
There is a concerted effort to drive down wages in this country. Believe it now or wait until it hits you.
Anyway, I tried hard to bite my tongue. I see nothing positive about this president. And I see nothing being done to benefit the american people.

BUSH

no doubt about it!

I agree G2.............and that makes me a little scared, both because I agree with you on this, and that the outsourcing of jobs will continue ....no matter who is President. I was a little sad to hear about Levi's last week, but it has been coming for a long time. It's just one more product I won't be buying. Can I even get dressed w/o Levi's? ........I' am going to find out, that's for sure. How about the rest of you?

It will be interesting to see if the election follows the pole results on this forum.