And they are for chickenhawks to wear so that no one will know their true identity.

wow, MNF to socks with sand in 'em. We have come full circle..

And nobody thinks TO is an A$$?

-----------------------------------------------------------

This board is going the way of nwfishing.com

He's the biggest ass in the NFL...........and that's saying something.

Are you afraid of tits Rory?

------------------------------------------------------------

Not at all.

I'm afraid of the shriveled up utters which is what most of the hairy armpitted, vegan, unbathed patchuli smelling fema-nazis have that insist on sharing them with the whole world.

Now if the woman in SundayMoney's Avatar wants to give nurishment to her child in public....that's fine.

AMAZING! Rory has stumbled upon the "discovery" that he has a choice of which ones he could "oogle" and which ones to avoid.

Brilliant. Maybe TK will evolve enough to realize the same. Unless of course, neither of them has the self control to avoid looking at ANY exposed breasts. :rolleyes:

:D

I don't think there's anything wrong (or 'dirty' as the 'enlightened' left likes to say) with breast feeding on public.

What I think is wrong is all the free plubicity this stupid show is getting from this liitle stunt...and that fact that millions of people are talking about it is proof that it worked.

The increased talk (interest) in Nicolette Sheridan's MNF spot will certainly bring higher ratings to her show the next time it's on.

That will ensure that we at some point see another 'titalating' spot/stunt on network TV to cause contreversy and increase interest in a star or show.

I am glad I 'quit' TV. Other than the sporting events, I really don't miss it that much. Far easier to quit than smoking, and almost as beneficial.
So I missed the MNF deal, and somehow , I don't feel I missed much. Turn off the TV for one week, just one, and see what happens. Just try it. You can always turn it back on.

KK

Anybody read any good books lately??

The feminazi's are all about a womans right to choose and branding men the enemy. Men are pigs if they object to the Le Leche leauge prowling the hospitals pressuring woman to breast feed. The feminazi's also have made sure that all women get asked if they are being emotionally or physically abused when they check in. Maybe they would not object to right wing groups letting women know that warehousing their kids in day cares and using nannies is detrimental to the kids and society and that it makes them bad mom's or that it's OK for a woman not to choose to breast feed and it does not mean she is a bad mother.

At LEAST you recognize it's the womans right to decide for herself. But no woman should feel confined to their homes just because they're nursing babies so as not to offend YOU.

And as to the other... I would prefer to see mothers staying home with their children at least until they start school, and I don't mean "pre-school." There are lots of "good" moms who "have" to work, but I always felt it was best if they don't.

Agreed elvis:
But how would they pay for the new SUV, or the time share on the Big Island? Not to mention the trips to Bellevue Square. If I were Governator (sorry Gpa) I'd demolish Bellevue Square, and...............wait, I'd just demolish Bellevue. Too many parents, abdicating their parental responsibilities, in pursuit of God knows what. It is truly a sad statement on society. Whoops, gotta go, 'Fear Factor ' is on.

KK

KK, There is hope for you

Wow. Suddenly, women who work only do so to buy luxuries?

How ill informed.

Speaking of TV and highjacking a thread, has anyone here ever seen the BBC documentary--

"7-UP"?

It was one of the most interesting things I've ever seen on TV. It was inspired by the Old Testament verse/saying (don't ask me where)~Give me a child until he's 7 and I'll give you the man.

It was originally filmed in post WWII England in the 50's w/ a group of 7 year old classmates--it studied the way they behaved and filmed them for an entire year at their school and the way they were raised by their parents and their homelife.

It then studied the exact same kids at their school and homes @ 14 and then again a @ 21 @ 28 and lastly when they were 35.

It was absolutely amazing to see that the same characteristics in their personalities at all the age levels from 7 to 35. The people they were at 7 were basically the same at 35~just a little bigger.

If anyone knows of this BBC series that was on PBS or where I might be able to get a tape of it please let me know.

AM:

Not all women do so, but I have almost 30 years in a service industry, primarily the tony Eastside, and primarily high end work. I've seen enough of it, but I know what you're saying. My Mom worked, after we were older kids, and it certainly wasn't for luxuries. Then again, luxuries were not something to aspire to, as we had all we needed, and more..
I know many friends who also work, and are somewhat uneasy about it.
A good life, and a good income, are not the same, nor are they mutually exclusive.
It all depends on what you deem most important. Too much emphasis is placed on material wealth, and the supposed status, and 'good life' it will bring. Vacuous , vapid people are the result, of both genders.
As an aside, I do not consider myself ill informed. I do, however, find you annoying at times.

KK

Aunty I agree and I am not trying to stir the pot with my next comment it is more a question.

I am all for women’s lib, don’t get me wrong. However I have often wondered if the Super Moms, the ones that want to be moms and have a career are were part of the problem with today’s society started.

Before women’s lib the moms stayed home and the house hold made ends meat on one budget. Then so many women went to work that a big majority of house holds had extra cash. Businesses found out they could raise prices, causing the house holds with non working moms to go to work to now afford ends meat. Now you have a society where both mom and dad work to get by when in the past we didn’t have to do this. Just a thought what do ya guys think? Again if moms want to work that is there choice I am just throwing out a thought. Is this what happened?

LT,

Back in those days you had one car a 1200 sf home with a small yard. If you had a boat it was a wooden row boat and the family vaction was to eastern wa. to go camping. As a kid I had two pairs of pants may 3 or 4 shirts and one pair of shoes. You took care of them because they had to last. We did not have a lot of toys we had to use our imaginations. A soda was a luxury and a cup of coffee for the folks was at home.

IMHO that does not sound like the avg. family today anywhere. It sounds like only the poor people that dropped out of school or made bad choices or just have below avg. desire or intelligence. Every one else as 10x the material possesions today vs. 40 years ago.

king

What you said makes sense to me