http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticl...LLIPS-EARNS.xml

SEATTLE - After a painful summer at the gas pumps for so many Americans, we're now getting a look at how much profit the oil companies raked in. Extra cash is being measured in not just millions but billions of dollars, and that's even getting the attention of a Republican-controlled Congress.
It was a very good summer for the oil giants, which are just now starting to announce record profits for July, August and September. With all of that money being made, even Republicans are turning up the heat for changes in the oil industry.
The political anxiety over high gasoline prices is reaching a new level in Congress. It's become so tense, House Republican leaders are taking aim at the oil industry, traditionally a GOP ally.
“These are extraordinary times that call for tough measures,” said Dennis Hastert, House Speaker. “We expect oil companies to do their part to help ease the pain American families are feeling with high energy prices."
Lawmakers are pressing the industry to explain what it's doing to boost fuel supplies and lower costs and questions about why a new refinery has not been built in the United States in the past 30 years.
There's a whole lot of money being raked in by the oil companies these days. In the past three months, the top five oil giants made anywhere from $20-$28 billion in profit. BP alone reports an extra $2 billion more than the same period last year. Even the deadly gulf coast hurricanes have been a boon.
Analysts say idled production drove prices higher and those higher prices more than made up for lost production from the storms.
Democrats called for more drastic measures, such as temporarily suspending the federal gas tax or imposing a tax on windfall profits that the oil companies are seeing.
Other oil companies, such as Exxon-Mobil, Chevron and Conoco-Phillips, will announce their record profits during the days ahead.

If you understood how the comodities markets worked you would see that speculation drove the costs up. You do not have to do business with them.
I bet you buy bottled water talk about getting gouged.

Very true. It is a free and unregulated market on the crude end and somewhat regulatated on the price at the pump end. Congress is only looking at it beacuse the mid term elections. They will find nothing wrong as it has been investigated to death. Quit using so much stinking oil and the issue goes away. It's up to you not them.

Can anyone think of a single time when an oil company posted a "loss". They have the single highest profit margin of any commodity on the face of the earth ( with the exception of illeagle drugs) Enron created a energy crisis, made billions of dollars, and wound up getting busted. Is the oil industery so different. I don't know the answer, but the fact that record almost insane profits by the big players during a time of supposed crisis seems like a dead give away of corruption on many levels.

B-Run. Not true if you look a % of profit for each quatitiy sold. Beer is much higher and MS Windows blows the door off of just about everything. The profit dollars are high because of the volume but the % of profit is around 10% which is in line with most industries.

Actually, beer and MS Windows are not commodities. When compaired to actual commodities, oil is king. Example, if wheat growers got 10% on the grain they ship all over the world there would be so many Billionairs in farm country that it would blow our minds. A loaf of bread would cost 5 bucks, and so on.

Your right about the fact that we don't have to buy it.

What about precious metals? The return on Gold this year has been higher that 10% I think? It does not matter because it is an unregulated business. If the demand where higher for whaet and the supply lower the price would reflect it. Go back 70 years and it was reversed Wheat brought in more the oil. I think a loaf in adjusted dollars was near $5. Oranges last year reflected this as well.

Also some perspective on the bigger picture. If you make $9000 a year in the US and you compare your income to the rest of the world you are in the top 15% of all wage earners. If you make $30k a year there are 5.5 billion people that make less than you. Everyone of them has higher gas prices than you . So quit your biotching.

Gold is different. It is not really produced in any significant amount. The Gold that is being bought and sold on the commodities market already exists for the most part. Thats one of the major reasons that it is an economic indicator of sorts. The chances of a large amount of "new" gold hitting the market and lowering the price is almost zero. Wheat on the other hand, is a commodity that can fluctuate with the weather, amount of land in production, and emerging markets. Its also regulated. Example: The goverment will pay farmers to reduce the amount they grow at times, in an effort to keep the meager profit margin intact following a banner year. Wheat farmers also post losses alot of the time. Oil never has a loss. Oranges are oranges. People don't have to have them so its a self regulating commodity. Good years followed by bad years. They are also not a world wide commodity like oil or wheat.

tk- if you understand the international commodities market you also understad why drilling in anwr will not help us out one bit and will only prolong our dependence on foreign oil

Okay ya'll ... less have some answers for this one.

Diesel prices are averaging over 50 cents per gallon more than gas.

Yadaydayada ... I know that because diesel is similar to home heating fuel, the supply is tighter.

Please answer me why dielsel prices in Canada are still reflecting the long-term price normality of dielsel about 40-50 cents LESS per gallon?

A $1 per gallon difference when compared to the gas prices in each country ... what gives???

--------------------------------------------------

The reason that they (oil companies) don't build any new refining facilities in the United States is because the environmental nazis have made it virtually impossible to make it profitable enough to do so after they jump through all their legal hoops and excessive regulation--if you're looking to blame someone for the lack of refining here in the states, you need not look any further than than the tree-hugging hippies. The true goal of those pulling the strings on the far left is to hurt capitalism and make socialism seem more viable~flame away but it's true. I think there a lot of well intentioned people on the left who do want to improve the envirnment, but whether they intend to or not, many are really just usefull idiots for those pro-socialist leftests agenda and marching orders they follow.

We could all be benefitting from the cheap and safe energy produced by Nuclear plants (like France is currently because they don't have many natural resources)) if it weren't for the tree huggers here in America too.

TK is right about most so-called environmentalists being hypocrits--I laugh when RFK Jr. flys all over the world in his private jet telling the rest of us about the need to conserve energy and drive hybrid Yuga type little match-box cars. : One of the funniest things ever was after Teddy and RFK Jr. (who were both born into wealth and privildge and never had to worry about money or how they would provide for their families )had been talking endlessly about how the evil capitalism and corperations are destrotying the planet and how we need to all be more 'green'---then when they were going to put wind mills to gernerate power in Hyannis Port to make cheap non-evironementally harmfull energy they pitched a b!tch and insisted it be stopped because it would ruin the views from their mult-million dollar mansions that are heated and air conditioned year round.

Seattle city just spent countless millions building their new Municipal building so that t was 'Green'---it turns out after all that money spent to make it 'Green' and not use too many finite resources to make it operational that it actually takes a lot more energy to operate it than it did the old building.

There is no sufficient amount of hoops that an oil company could jump through to build a new refinery. Our lawsuit-based NIMBY society has made it literally impossible. The last new refinery was built 20 years ago. I believe our population and thirst for gasoline has increased a bit since then.

Whatever you think of Bush, I think he had a good idea in converting abandoned military bases into refinerys.

I believe the lack of diesel refining capacity in the US is the reason for the inappropriate high prices compared to gas. I think more diesel refining is coming back on line soon to bring the price more in line.

I have never heard that idea from Bush or anyone else but its a damn good idea. If G.W did indeed come up with that one, I go on record here and now as having agreed with him at least once.

Bob,

I do not think Canada has zone pricing like we do down here. The crude and refining costs could be different depending on who you are buying from. The population of Canada is less than that of California and growing less so you would see less demand pressure on a specific grade. Look how many diesel vehicles we have down here now compared to 10 years ago. I bet Canada has stayed relatively the same.

I'm just back from Costa Rica. Gas prices there recently shot up dramatically to about 3.50 per gallon. The guide said they have extra refining capacity and the supply from near by Venezuala is abundant. He thought the price went up just simply becasue the producers have the power to charge more.

Why would they? Extra refining capacity equals increased supply, equals lower prices.

Besides, they have dorks like Rory blaming the tree huggers when he'd become one himself if they proposed a refinery next door to him.

Even if they wanted to the current with the current regs it would take 20 years. Same with a nuke plant or a coal fired electric plant. You bend over,lube up and then pay them to slam it to ya why bitoch about your own choices?

KK,
Theoretically at this point. I would not build one either. Business are in business to make money. Liberals seem to think that they have a god given right to cheap energy with no environmental impact. Childish at best. I doubt you charge far less than the market would bear and end each year with a zero balance bank account? I did notice in your fishing pics that you seem to favor top of the line gear. No Zebcos' and Southbends for you

No I think most people on the right expect to pay a fair price for goods and services and hope to keep govt. out of that process. They also realize that you have to balance the needs of the many against the environment if you want to have this many people on the planet living the way we do.

In other words we are based in reality.