P.S. now that you got rid of the inlines, shouldn't you go for the compound bow?

No, but are working on the sights that can be used.

Your right, I do lump gun guys in a pile because there are a core group of them that just wear my ass out. Mr " Guns and Ammo " that gravitates to you at lunch time because he knows you hunt therfore must be willing to be subjected endless banter about useless crap.. and is creepier than the "perps" he wishes he could shoot. Its wrong and I admit it. Guys who are all wound up about why they can't use a 30 round clip out hunting are "gun show goofs".

I'm just a sportsman thats hunted all his life. I don't want these guys representing me or my sport in any way.

So noted, agree

I agree that the "Gun Nuts" wear my ass out as well. It's the reason why I cancelled my NRA membership last fall. (That and they are a wholly owned fund-raising subsidary of the RNC.) The type I refer to are the gun show goofs--the ones who wear full camo BDU's to gunshows and hang around the book table where literary classics such as The Turner Diaries, The International Jew, and Mein Kampf can be found displayed prominently under a 3'x5' confederate flag.

However just because a group of total douchebags wants to play with Machineguns is no reason to go around banning the damned things. Lock up the douchebags, not thier toys.

A .308 is still a .308 no matter what you shoot it out of.

Ever seen a Gun show Goof with an array of Military Patches on his custom Camo that just leaves you scratching your head. He has a 1 st Cav patch and a CIB ( with jump wings) a Special forces Group patch.. a Ranger Patch.. and is all of say 35 years old ( and was not born when these patches were handed out let alone earned any of them ) On his pocket, he has a " Master Glock Target aquisition Expert " patch.. WTF is that and who gives them out ??

These guys are a blast to F-with

" So.. as a fetus you were in Nam then joined the Marines, but not until you became a jump master in the Special forces and skipped Kindergarten to go to Ranger School ??"

Your a Baaaadddd Man alright.

B-run,

I also enjoy bagging on the "Tacticool" guys. Nice to see we agree on something. There are also the guys that I refer to as FUDD gunners (as in Elmer Fudd). These guys only fire two or three rounds a year in practice, hit the paper plate set up at 25 yards, and call it good.

I usually shoot 500 to a thousand rounds a year, in different rifles and handguns, so that when the shot arises I'll be able to hit my mark. Usually I'll get out 2 or 3 days a month to practice, sometimes more.

The 30 round mags don't work so well at the bench and the woods, because of their length, so I tend to gravitate to the 10 and 20 rounders. The 10 rounders (.223/5.56) will hold only 3 rounds of my .458 SOCOM, so while it looks large, its just because the round is so large that it stacks single file instead of staggered like a .223 round. Some folks will even go so far as to take a proven reliable mag and insert a pop rivet to limit the number of rounds the mag can hold for hunting.

Heck, I can even get a 20 round mag for my Remingtion 740 auto-loader, if I want, but I'm happy with the 4 rounders I have. I did switch out the wood stock to plastic, as I hunt in the rain, and the old stock my grampa had on it was dinged, scratched, cracked and dented.

There was this one guy in Seattle named Keith Gilbert who clamed to be a Veitnam Vet. He liked to wear camo and wear the POW-MIA type pins. He was a real gun nut. He sold AK-47 parts kits online, and showed off his arms collection on the internet.

Well it turned out that he had dodged the Veitnam draft and spent the time trying to blow up Civil Rights activists--especially one named Martin Luther King Jr. He served a lengthy prison sentance for that one. After he got out of prison, he went up to Hayden Lake where he was kicked out for being too fanatical. He eventually ended up as a hired goon for a Seattle Slum Lord and was known for sicking his dogs on little black children and also trying to run them over with his car. And also changing his tenant's locks and requiring a $300 "neighborhood association membership" to get their new keys.

Online, his persona was that of a patriotic disabled War Vet, an upstanding citizen, yada yada... turns out his "Parts Kits" were actual smuggled full auto AK's from Russia that had just been disassembled to make them look legal. When he finally got busted, all this stuff came out about him. He was one of those Gun Show Bubbas that wore the camo & patches. Damn glad I never ordered those parts from him.

I think the focus of this thread was intened to be about the rifle and not the guy behind it. Range and shot placement should be the concern.

I have an SKS but I have never hunted with it because I have much better options of range and accuracy in my gun safe. I think I could hunt deer with it but I would limit my shots to muzzleloader type ranges and handload some nice cartriges for the job. I would feel like camo goon walking around with it in the woods though.

B-Run, am I supposed to think you are one of the millions of jackasses out there in a store bought tree stand coughing through your shiny new fart silencer in scent proof clothes with doe in heat scent sprayed all over your fat body, which is covered head to toe in some kind of trendy camo ?

There are a lot of a-holes in this world, some in almost every crowd, most crowds are wholey made up of them in my opinion...

I own a couple of rifles with custom barrels and stocks, own a couple handfulls of factory rifles, handload all of my own ammo, use a chronograph and some knowledge of ballistics to make drop charts for my rifles, and have target turrets which can put the crosshairs on the point of impact to way on out there if I choose, all so I can shoot water jugs and rocks...

I don't have any military crap, swords, throwing stars, numchucks, rebel flags, ear rings, tatoos, 30 round clips, or whatever else you seen me with in your dream................


I do stand 6'2", weigh 210-220 lbs, and cut timber in the Coast Range more or less 7 days a week, any fat that I can keep on is well enough placed not to bother your eyes................

P.S. I am a contractor who gets paid only for what I get done, not a clock punching bagdragger, so if you happen to know some fat lazy cutters, there really isn't much to compare.


Now, I don't expect an apology, but I think we'd all be better off if you'd stop bragging about your ignorance.

P.P.S.
I happen to agree with you that some of the new style tricked out muzzle-loaders defeat the intended purpose of the special hunting seasons, and are probably more appropriate in the general rifle seasons..........some parallels could probably drawn with archery too, but I don't feel qualified to make the determinations.

I have killed deer and elk with both rifle and archery equipment, in case I need to clarify that.

Wow... This has gone in an interesting direction.

Generalizations and stereo types can be dangerous. Let's try to keep this from getting anymore personal then it already has.

Well said, O, agree, but you are probably one of them guys who still runs 404

Negative on the 404, but am guilty of getting all the way down to a 28" bar ! Logging has morphed into tree farming, which is undoubtedly better for the fish than splashdam logging !

We still wack a big one every now and then, I even posted some pics to mixed reviews on here once.

I love watchin the fir fly

Thanks for allowing me to speak my piece, I imagine we are headed in a better direction...

B-Run still uses woven linen line when he fishes and ties his flies with the pubic hair of virgins....keep on with your agenda B-Run you do all hypocrites well...

To answer the original question military rifles can and do make fine hunting rifles regardless of color or appearance...as stated before caliber and ballistics are more important than a puritans assesement of suitability...

RVW

i totaly agree with you on that.

i go to the range with a friends dad, him and his buddie have been hunting sence the 70's, between the both of them they have shot 2 deer.

they are all about guns, and target shooting. they only hunt for the experience of getting drunk and shooting off their semi auto assault weapons during hunting season. they will start convo's about hunting then quickly turn them into well my 223 will out shoot your 7mm and my 30-06 is a much better gun for hunting then your 243. if you are gonna hunt with a 243 you need to have at least this many rounds in the gun, type conversations.

with not logic on hunting at all, they look at every huntin situation as if they were at the range with their buddies just shooting off 30 rounds at a time.

i made the mistake of going hunting with them once. it was late hunt. the best time of the season imo, bunch of guys out trying their hardest to fill their tags.
we were at a clearcut and seen a spike about mid way in the clearcut. and they all decided it would be a fun game to see who could shoot it first. and it was sickening. 10 rounds through that deer out of 3 guns. all of which were semi auto 30-06's. then for the next year they bragged about how that deer dropped dead in its tracks and they were the best hunters/shots in the woods. W/E end of story its pissing me off. just an idea of some peoples ideas of what huntin is.

i really dont mind the "gun guys". and to me military rifles are ok for hunting. to a certain point. obviously a ak47 with a 20 round clip is just retarded. or some super sniper rifle is just to rediculous in some cases. i know i dont really like to see guys walking around with ak's and sniper rifles when im out busting brush or walking through some timber.

but in certain cases they are fine.

i know that its all to temping to just open up on a deer in the brushif oyu have a semi auto, or take rediculously long shots if you have a sniper rifle.

example. my uncle, he has been hunting sence the 60's shoots a browning 30-06 semi auto, 5 rounds clips. he will shoot the entire clip at a deer, even if the first shot hits. last year he used is winchester blot action 30-06 and missed a deer. he drove the hours back to the house to get his semi auto that way he wouldnt miss. NOW in that case he would not be someone that should be hunting with a semi auto military rifle. the opporunity to put more rounds in a clip would just be scary for him to have. wether legal or not.

now my dad is all about accuracy, and i have never seen him take more then 2 shots at a deer ever, either he misses and shoots again or he misses and just lets the deer take off. he shoots a enfield 303 british with 10rounds clips, sure he could put 10 rounds in it, even though not legal. but he only puts 1 round in at a time. NOw in his case i wouldnt care if he used an ak 47 or a single shot ruger no.1

it all on the person shooting the gun, and their hunting ethics.

some people are ok with semi auto's, and some people shouldnt even be allowed to touch a gun, and they are still out hunting which really bugs me.

each person get their own views and opinions on this subject, and in their own way they feel they are right.

Deerslayer,

I've changed over to a muzzle loader (ML) because of the one shot hunt. It makes you become a better hunter. There were other reasons, too. Got my first elk that way, plus 3 more, and I've taken 7 deer with them as well.

That said, I always make it a point to take some sort of game with every rifle I own. Coyotes and bobcats are my primary game of choice that I'll go after with my AR. Once I get my new .458 upper, I'll take it out for deer, and possibly elk.

I've also hunted with guys who use bolt guns that are slobs. My second reason for changing over to ML was that some guy on a landing above me decided to check out who I was, using the scope attached to his bolt action rifle. I was none too pleased.

Like you said, it is all about the person and their ethics, not the gun.

I have been a fanatical hunter all my life.
It is all about the hunt , the wildlife & the outdoors.
My gun or bow is just a tool.
I like the most precise tool I can get, but I don't really obsess over it.
I also understand that the second ammendment has absolutley nothing to do with hunting.

B-Run, am I supposed to think you are one of the millions of jackasses out there in a store bought tree stand coughing through your shiny new fart silencer in scent proof clothes with doe in heat scent sprayed all over your fat body, which is covered head to toe in some kind of trendy camo ?

Wow.. you must be able to see into my living room..

I guess you make a valid point.. Gaget guy is a hunter and he can wear my ass out ass well. Some years ago, a dumbass I have hunted with bought one of those self climbing tree stands. He got like 25 feet up in a tree and was too scared to come down.. " I can't come up and get ya so I guess we will just leave ya here and say howdy to your skeleton next year.. are you coming down or what ??"

I understand what some of you are saying, but I don't agree that any type of gun should be legal as long as you are hunting in season. Maybe that gun should be legal to own, but not to hunt with. By your rationale, why can't I drive around in the woods in a tank blowing up animals, as long as I have a tag? Because it is unsportsmanlike, and it is dangerous to the general public. I don't know enough about guns to say what is and isn't sporting, but there should be some sort of regulation on what is allowable.

However, following the logic of Indians being allowed to net rivers, they should be allowed to use whatever gun, cannon, or bomb they want for hunting. They should be able to use boobie traps, hidden pits with spikes in the bottom, and steel claw bear traps to kill game animals and leave them rotting for a while.