#434031 - 05/12/08 12:58 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Jerry Garcia]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1191
|
More hatchery plants would mean more hatchery fish on the spawning grounds reducing the amount of wild fish spawning sucessfully meaning less wild fish coming back. I disagree!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434032 - 05/12/08 01:02 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Ikissmykiss]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1191
|
Here is my issue with CR spring Chinook fishery, admittedly a fishery I know very little about and have never participated in.....this is a fishery where they have the ability to know exactly how many fish are going over Bonneville. Instead of "forecasting" the run size, letting people pound them below Bonneville for X number of days, then saying Uh Oh, there's not enough fish we better shut it down, why not wait until enough fish have passed over the dam and THEN open it up....above the dam, below the dam, or both?
I've always felt the only fishery this state runs correctly (besides put and take lowland lake trout) is the Lake WA sockeye fishery. If enough fish don't enter the lake, the fishery is not opened. How hard is that? Due to the fact that they can count all the fish, don't they have that same ability on the Columbia?
Ike The Columbia River is completely different fishery to manage than Lake Washington Sockeye. They would not manage Lake Washington Sockeye this way if the Locks were at the Mouth of the Cedar River.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434034 - 05/12/08 01:04 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: jandlfishingguide]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/09/04
Posts: 1016
Loc: Napavine,Washington
|
JG I still think the way to ensure that NO hatchery fish get onto the spawning beds would be to erect a barrier dam like is on the Cowlitz on any river that has a native run. This with a fish sorting facility would all but insure no passage of non wild fish. I think we all pretty much agree the numbers of "wild" fish on most rivers are probably miss/non clipped hatchery origin fish. I was told once that the tribes were against clipping all hatchery fish. Does anyone know if this is the case?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434036 - 05/12/08 01:43 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Salmo g.]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 03/01/03
Posts: 1244
Loc: Snohomish County
|
As you can see and already know, fish management is as much or more about what people want than it is about what fish need. That's it in a nutshell, unfortunately. Let's let everybody have their wack at 'em before we know how many are coming back and worry about the welfare of the fish later.....sad. Jerry, the only comparison I was drawing between the two fisheries is the fish managers ability to know exactly how many fish are returning to the system. Ike
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434037 - 05/12/08 01:50 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Salmo g.]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Ikiss,
Yes, the ability to manage the Columbia spring chinook run that way is hypothetically possible, but it would ignore the desires of the LCR non-treaty commercial fleet and the LCR recreational fleet. No openings until an in season update based on fish over Bonneville would be very good for the wild fish. As you can see and already know, fish management is as much or more about what people want than it is about what fish need.
Sg Pull the LCR Commercial fisherman out of the river and there's a strong chance you'll see it managed this way. Another decent reason to keep the LCR Commercial fisherman fishing... Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434075 - 05/12/08 05:36 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: laterun]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1191
|
JG I still think the way to ensure that NO hatchery fish get onto the spawning beds would be to erect a barrier dam like is on the Cowlitz on any river that has a native run. This with a fish sorting facility would all but insure no passage of non wild fish. I think we all pretty much agree the numbers of "wild" fish on most rivers are probably miss/non clipped hatchery origin fish. I was told once that the tribes were against clipping all hatchery fish. Does anyone know if this is the case? Great idea but like Keith states, this would only work if the state cliped 100% of the hatchery fish. At the fish collection facility at Barrier they count misclipped hatchery fish as wild. So in this example hatchery fish with adipose fins are being trucked up river and released and released into the upper Cowlitz watershed.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434080 - 05/12/08 06:17 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: jandlfishingguide]
|
Spawner
Registered: 03/17/99
Posts: 774
Loc: Everett, WA USA
|
I was told by one of the bios. on the Kalama that the reason that not all fish are clipped is so that they can make sure they get back some fish. Check out the fish that return to the hatchery and you will see some fish with all their fins. A good example is the summer kings from the Wallace hatchery. Go check the creek below the weir and see if some of those fish have all their fins. The summer kings are all hatchery.
_________________________
"Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." Will Rogers
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434084 - 05/12/08 06:38 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: stever in everett]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1191
|
Did this bio really think that if all (100%) of the hatchery fish were clipped that this would lead to 0% escapement? That because they are all clipped that they would all bite and get caught?
I think thats a ridiculous reason to not clip them all.
Well as of last Thursday the Kalama hatchery has no report on the WDFW escapement report for springers. Is this because of the hatchery fish being clipped?
Stever, not bashing you but I think that idea from this Bio on the Kalama is idiotic thinking.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434093 - 05/12/08 07:00 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Jerry Garcia]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
I was looking at the spring chinook plants in the Lewis and about 30% of them are not clipped from the hatchery....
It's a bogus way of getting fish back to the hatchery, not all hatchery fish are biters... Plus it's a complete smoke screen to stop fishing on "wild" fish....
Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434100 - 05/12/08 07:34 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Castingpearls]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
There's some that "say" they do...
Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434124 - 05/12/08 11:02 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: stlhdr1]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/28/01
Posts: 324
Loc: olympia
|
everything's getting clipped on the LCR this year ....springers ..falls and coho....anybody not clip 30% of their springers from here on out is gonna be unemployed real quick....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434128 - 05/12/08 11:52 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: bodysurf]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/28/01
Posts: 324
Loc: olympia
|
also...the wallace river summers that aren't clipped are part of a double index tag group...tag a couple hundred thousand fish with one code and adipose clip them...then tag a couple hundred thousand with a different code and don't clip them to simulate "wild fish"...to see if people have been releasing unclipped fish... ...pretty sure all of puget sound and the coast are being mass marked too......
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434133 - 05/13/08 12:11 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: stlhdr1]
|
Carcass
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 2199
Loc: Bainbridge Island
|
Just curious, but if the hatchery got back mostly non biting fish because those were the majority of fish that made it back, would those genes affect the fishing for the fish returning from those stocks?
_________________________
Fish donts gots no good metal to listens to. - Skwisgaar from Dethklok
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434147 - 05/13/08 01:38 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: TBJ]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Just curious, but if the hatchery got back mostly non biting fish because those were the majority of fish that made it back, would those genes affect the fishing for the fish returning from those stocks? I don't think there's a problem there, there's too many variances in what makes it back to the hatchery... Ie. early fish, big schools that show at once, days with little to no pressure, etc... Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434148 - 05/13/08 01:39 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: bodysurf]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
everything's getting clipped on the LCR this year ....springers ..falls and coho....anybody not clip 30% of their springers from here on out is gonna be unemployed real quick.... If that's true I look forward to seeing the hatchery releases on paper, I still don't beleive it.... Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434156 - 05/13/08 02:07 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Salmo g.]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1191
|
Keith,
You may have a point, but I'll take my chances with terminating the LCR gillnet fishery. Just because it's gone doesn't add up to reason for terminating a recreational fishery in the same area. Each should be analyzed on its respective merits and decisions made accordingly to the best balance of biological and social interests.
Sg Salmo, I believe the point Keith is trying to make is quite simple. No LCR gillnet fishery and hatcheries on the Cowlitz and Lewis rivers will not have to raise/plant those fish that were taken in the gillnet fishery. Seems to me the production numbers would drop on the LCR with no gillnet fishery. Simple suply and Demand. I certainly don't think that those hatcheries would continue to keep the status quo on plants just for the recreational fisherman?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
1886
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11505 Members
17 Forums
73128 Topics
827896 Posts
Max Online: 14307 @ 05/22/26 06:24 PM
|
|
|