Check

 

Defiance Boats!

LURECHARGE!

THE PP OUTDOOR FORUMS

Kast Gear!

Power Pro Shimano Reels G Loomis Rods

  Willie boats! Puffballs!

 

Three Rivers Marine

 

 
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#975947 - 04/04/17 07:23 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
The Director is in a difficult position. He has no money unless the legislature and governor give it to him. He can't simply spend money unless it is appropriated.

If the legislature;ature is mad, they can control the money.

So, he can say all he wants but if the Leg says no money, they're broke.

Top
#975948 - 04/04/17 07:38 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Carcassman]
Piper
Unregistered


Originally Posted By: Carcassman
The Director is in a difficult position. He has no money unless the legislature and governor give it to him. He can't simply spend money unless it is appropriated.

If the legislature;ature is mad, they can control the money.

So, he can say all he wants but if the Leg says no money, they're broke.


I aggree and dissagree, there is a fvck load of money in fisheries right now... but our legislatures would rather have that money fill their re-election coffers than actually go to the fisheries...

legalize gambling or at least threaten to legalize it and watch the cockroaches run... untaxed $$

Top
#975950 - 04/04/17 08:22 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: ]
RowVsWade Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/08/06
Posts: 3405
Loc: Island Time
Originally Posted By: Piper
Originally Posted By: Carcassman
The Director is in a difficult position. He has no money unless the legislature and governor give it to him. He can't simply spend money unless it is appropriated.

If the legislature;ature is mad, they can control the money.

So, he can say all he wants but if the Leg says no money, they're broke.


legalize gambling or at least threaten to legalize it and watch the cockroaches run... untaxed $$


That's it right there. There's more than one way to level the playing field.
_________________________
"...the pool hall I loved as a kid is now a 7-11..."

If you don't like our prices bring your wife down and we'll dicker.

Top
#975952 - 04/04/17 09:49 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
Still doesn't change the fact if the Leg does not appropriate money to WDFW they have nothing to spend.

Top
#975954 - 04/04/17 11:11 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Bay wolf]
Larry B Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/22/09
Posts: 3020
Loc: University Place and Whidbey I...
Originally Posted By: Bay wolf
Originally Posted By: Larry B
Originally Posted By: Bay wolf
A Director of a Department who has the responsibility to manage OUR public resources, who goes before a Senate committee and does such a poor job of presenting his case should not get the sympathy of the citizens, he should be run out of town!

Is there any question WHY our fisheries are spiraling down the $hithole and the Tribes are running the show?

My sympathies go out to the poor staff at WDFW that are busting their humps trying to make sense out of a Department who's leadership is just plain incompetent.


Why are the tribes running the show? Not because of the Director or the Commission! While WDFW certainly has its issues the Leadership Issue which Sen. Pearson opined it is my view that that problem starts at the top - meaning Federal. And then there is the Governor and State legislature which further constrains the Commission and Department.

So, let's hold the Commission and Director accountable for what is within their purview - and not for perceived failures over which they have little or no control.

And let's also continue to push those in a position of power for appropriate changes both in financing and relationships with the tribes.


Thank you Larry,

You and I have agreed on many points and I respect your opinion, on this though, we have a difference of perspective:

It IS the Directors responsibility to manage the resource. If it fails, it is ultimately his failure. If he does not have the tools to effectively do his job, or is in need of assistance to correct some issues that impact his ability to responsibly manage, then it is HIS responsibility to reach out and seek that assistance. Are the Feds needed to correct the permitting issue which gives the Tribes leverage in the NOF process, yes. Is it the Directors responsibility to get federal assistance by notifying the appropriate departments, yes.

An effective leader stands up for what he believes, says what he means, and means what he says.

For example: Director Unsworth stated publicly that he supported open NOF meetings, yet what did he do to try to get that accomplished? He allowed the Tribes to declare the meetings Gov't to Gov't, without any challenge at all. Further, he put out a public relations statement arguing FOR the Tribes position by saying "These government-to-government meetings must occur for fishing seasons to be set." It is HIS FAILURE to find a solution to the permitting problem that makes it a "MUST" we agree with what the Tribes want!

I can go on and on about failed accountability, failed enforcement, etc. It is clear, there is a lack of competent leadership. Leadership that will stand up for whats right!

Simply saying a leader is not to blame for his failures contradicts the meaning of leader. What an effective Department Head does is look for and works for solutions, not makes excuses that it's not his fault.

I agree, he is the head of a department that in many ways is a mire of agendas, influences, personalities and political end games, but that's what he was appointed to manage. Failing to do so, and looking for excuses is not leadership. At least not the leadership we need to fix the problems. We need a Director that will have the integrity to stand up. Seek the resources and assistance needed to make the changes, and let us all know when things aren't looking good so we can all work together to save our fish.


You have some points with which I agree. Could the current Director be more of an advocate at the Legislature? Probably. But keep in mind that the downward spiral of GF losses began under a prior Director. And when it comes to leadership I think it fair to also recognize that when a subordinate brings his needs forward and is rebuffed those making that decision have ownership of the results. Again, it is not as though the Legislature is totally dependent upon this Director's ability to make them aware of what has been occurring financially as well as the impacts of their (Legislative) GF cutbacks.
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!

It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)

Top
#975955 - 04/05/17 06:48 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Great Bender Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 01/03/17
Posts: 155
Loc: Hood Canal
I'm on board with Baywolf. Throughout this nightmare, I have yet to see any form of documented attempt to reach out to the Feds for oversight, direction, mediation or arbitration. Has it come down to arrogance and/or stubborn pride? Jim Goerg recently updated his running editorial @ Reel News by putting forth "WA State, the only one with two governments...the USofA, and the Tribes." For my part in this, it comes down to one simple principle, that being upholding and defending the civil liberties and rights of ALL Americans has the same priority, and is just as important as doing so for Native Americans. Get DC into this mess based on applying the principles set forth by the Boldt Decision, put all parties involved in their proper place, and return some sanity and direction to this fiasco.

Top
#975957 - 04/05/17 07:54 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Great Bender]
Larry B Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/22/09
Posts: 3020
Loc: University Place and Whidbey I...
Originally Posted By: Great Bender
I'm on board with Baywolf. Throughout this nightmare, I have yet to see any form of documented attempt to reach out to the Feds for oversight, direction, mediation or arbitration. Has it come down to arrogance and/or stubborn pride? Jim Goerg recently updated his running editorial @ Reel News by putting forth "WA State, the only one with two governments...the USofA, and the Tribes." For my part in this, it comes down to one simple principle, that being upholding and defending the civil liberties and rights of ALL Americans has the same priority, and is just as important as doing so for Native Americans. Get DC into this mess based on applying the principles set forth by the Boldt Decision, put all parties involved in their proper place, and return some sanity and direction to this fiasco.


In total agreement but remember that the Director is not an elected position. Protecting the rights of we citizens (when the treaties were signed tribal leaders signed for their tribes and citizens while Stevens et al signed for the U.S. Government and its citizens) should come from elected officials be it Federal enacting laws or State by way of the AG.

As an aside, I was just wondering if our illustrious Governor has paid off his bet (including smoked salmon) with the Gov of North Carolina using salmon he caught or tribal or Alaskan fish?
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!

It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)

Top
#975959 - 04/05/17 09:19 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Great Bender Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 01/03/17
Posts: 155
Loc: Hood Canal
If all that holds true, and the elected Governor delegates the enforcement authority to the WDFW, then so be it...otherwise, State Patrol men and women would have primary enforcement authority. They would then be faced with writing citations and making arrests just as the Wardens do now...with the same results. Native Americans are not subject to the same Washington State fish and game rules, regulations and laws intended to promote conservation and wanton waste of our resources. Last Fall's debacle at the Ballard Locks was on federally owned and controlled property, and it would be well-advised if Federal Marshalls be on-site when the Coho return once again. All in all, the comprehensive totality involved in this issue would see a plane load of Legislators, the Commissioners and their Director, WDFW field biologists, Commercial industry reps, CCA and PSA chapter heads and anyone else involved as both stakeholders and leaders to right a wrong, and bring about a sustained yield fisheries resource for us all.

Top
#975960 - 04/05/17 09:20 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Salmo g. Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 13521
I used IE in order to make the link work, so I finally was able to watch the linked meeting. Eh gads, I've never seen a departmental representative so unprepared to testify for a legislative committee. There used to be a Legislative Liaison position in the Department; I don't know if there still is. Some one needs to educate the Director about how state government works and how to work with the gov't.

Based on the W&M meeting and Pearson's NR committee meeting, it looks like no new money for WDFW in the upcoming biennium, and likely another decrease in GF money. It's late in the game now, but I think WDFW should "right size" its business plan based on the prospective budget and share it with the key Legislative committees so they have a heads up on hatchery closures and other cut backs to balance the Department's budget.

Since commercial fishing brings in less than 3% of the Department's budget, this could be a golden opportunity for the Department to close hatcheries that primarily produce salmon for BC and the small NT commercial fleets in GH, WB, and LCR. The Department should spend no more on commercial fishing than commercial fishing contributes to the Department, unless the Legislature chooses to provide GF $ to subsidize welfare fishing. That could alleviate most, if not all, of the projected budget shortfall.

Top
#975963 - 04/05/17 09:42 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Salmo g.]
JustBecause Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 07/18/08
Posts: 237
Salmo,

I've highlighted (bold) all of the areas in the WDFW Mission Statement that speak directly or indirectly to commercial enterprise or the benefits thereof. Maybe you folks should seek to change the Agency's mission statement? Otherwise, aren't they just following the State's mandate?

From the WDFW webpage:

Mission and Goals

Our Mission

To preserve, protect and perpetuate fish, wildlife and ecosystems while providing sustainable fish and wildlife recreational and commercial opportunities.

Vision

Conservation of Washington’s fish and wildlife resources and ecosystems.

WDFW defines “Conservation” as:

Protection, preservation, management, or restoration of natural environments and the ecological communities that inhabit them; including management of human use for public benefit and sustainable social and economic needs.
(Adapted from The American Heritage® Science Dictionary Copyright © 2005)

Department Goals

To achieve its mission, WDFW will continue to focus its activities on the following four goals:

Goal 1:
Conserve and protect native fish and wildlife

Goal 2:
Provide sustainable fishing, hunting, and other wildlife-related recreational and commercial experiences
Goal 3:
Promote a healthy economy, protect community character, maintain an overall high quality of life, and deliver high-quality customer service

Goal 4:
Build an effective and efficient organization by supporting our workforce, improving business processes, and investing in technology

Top
#975964 - 04/05/17 09:53 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Salmo g.]
Bay wolf Offline
Repeat Spawner

Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1075
Loc: Graham, WA
Originally Posted By: Salmo g.
I used IE in order to make the link work, so I finally was able to watch the linked meeting. Eh gads, I've never seen a departmental representative so unprepared to testify for a legislative committee. There used to be a Legislative Liaison position in the Department; I don't know if there still is. Some one needs to educate the Director about how state government works and how to work with the gov't.

Based on the W&M meeting and Pearson's NR committee meeting, it looks like no new money for WDFW in the upcoming biennium, and likely another decrease in GF money. It's late in the game now, but I think WDFW should "right size" its business plan based on the prospective budget and share it with the key Legislative committees so they have a heads up on hatchery closures and other cut backs to balance the Department's budget.

Since commercial fishing brings in less than 3% of the Department's budget, this could be a golden opportunity for the Department to close hatcheries that primarily produce salmon for BC and the small NT commercial fleets in GH, WB, and LCR. The Department should spend no more on commercial fishing than commercial fishing contributes to the Department, unless the Legislature chooses to provide GF $ to subsidize welfare fishing. That could alleviate most, if not all, of the projected budget shortfall.


Once again Salmo, you have some excellent points!
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."

1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)

Top
#975965 - 04/05/17 10:00 AM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: JustBecause]
Rivrguy Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4394
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope

I will say this one time here and former or current WDF&W employees do not get your panties in a knot. First good relations between the co managers is not possible with the current regime. WDF&W never has and never will accept tribal rights. That WDF&W ( with old Game ) threw the first, second, third blow and many more is undeniable. That the tribes weathered that and now have the upper hand is also true as is the fact that they wasted no time going for the " eye for an eye " bit.

Secondly if you think that WDF&W will turn loose of the NT Commercial fisheries minus legislative or court induced effort you are wrong. Why I do not know but I do know this. The dislike between the two staffs has gotten personal and at times border line raciest ON BOTH SIDES OF THE TABLE.

So if you think that the staff on either side is open to any damn thing your wrong again. It will require rather stern outside interference most likely from a judge to make it happen.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in

Top
#975977 - 04/05/17 01:11 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
The law does say "commercial". Does not say NI commercial. The Indians are commercial, they are voting citizens of the state, and maintaining their commercial industry complies with bit state and federal law.

Top
#975981 - 04/05/17 01:18 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Rivrguy]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
It was rather personal, to be sure. Having worked with the Tribes (mostly PS) for a while on primary salmon issues I found that a little honesty went a long ways. On both sides. We did our best technically and then let the policy folks make decisions. Most of the time, we were also told why so that we could explain it to stakeholders. WDG was less accommodating and had more conflicts.

Then we got Co-Management. At that point, rather than try to find the "best" answer we tried to satisfy the tribes.

Unfortunately, WDFW no longer has, in my mind, either a conservation ethic (Per Ado Leopold) or, an more importantly, any way to support one. They don't have the money, they don't have the authority to protect land and water for natural resource production, and they don't have political support to stop anybody.

As a consequence, folks find their narrow niche to work in and do that well. All the while ensuring that the walls of that silo are never scratched much less broken down.

Top
#975982 - 04/05/17 01:23 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Carcassman]
Larry B Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/22/09
Posts: 3020
Loc: University Place and Whidbey I...
Originally Posted By: Carcassman
The law does say "commercial". Does not say NI commercial. The Indians are commercial, they are voting citizens of the state, and maintaining their commercial industry complies with bit state and federal law.


That hot potato has come up before and for some reason no one wants to engage........
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!

It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)

Top
#975983 - 04/05/17 01:41 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: Carcassman]
JustBecause Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 07/18/08
Posts: 237
Originally Posted By: Carcassman
The law does say "commercial". Does not say NI commercial. The Indians are commercial, they are voting citizens of the state, and maintaining their commercial industry complies with bit state and federal law.


Good luck selling that in Pacific and Wahkiakum Counties, not to mention to the Puget Sound non-treaty pink, chum, and sockeye commercials.

Top
#975995 - 04/05/17 04:58 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
I believe that the Court, in a PS crab case, recently said that the recreational crab fishery was commercial because of the economic impact.

As to Pacific County, at least, they ARE the commercial entity. Whiakiakum may have to share with the upper Columbia tribes so there could be argument there but with no lower C tribes it could be argued that they, too, would be the commercial arm if the recs weren't a strong enough economic engine.

Top
#976003 - 04/05/17 07:13 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Salmo g. Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 13521
JustBecause,

Oh I understand the legislative mandate for commercial fishing. However, if the Legislature chooses not to provide sufficient funding for the Dept. to perform the task, the Dept. is likely on solid legal ground working on commercial fishing management to the extent commercial fishing funds the Dept. There is nothing at law that I am aware of that compels the Dept to rob fishing license fees to produce salmon for commercial harvest or perform the more detailed management exercises necessary for the highly consumptive commercial harvest.

The Legislature sets the budget, and it comes from various sources. The Dept should work for the constituents that produce income revenue for the Dept, proportional to the amount of that revenue.

Sg

Top
#976009 - 04/05/17 07:53 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
Carcassman Online   content
River Nutrients

Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7413
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
One thing to watch is not what the Leg, or any politician, says but what they put money to. It's what they're willing to spend money on.

Top
#976010 - 04/05/17 08:24 PM Re: WDFW Leadership [Re: The Moderator]
FleaFlickr02 Offline
River Nutrients

Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 3314
Sg is absolutely spot on, but JustBecause is also correct. The mission may not say "rob the citizens who pay the most for the fish," but the political reality is that it does just that.

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Search

Site Links
Home
Our Washington Fishing
Our Alaska Fishing
Reports
Rates
Contact Us
About Us
Recipes
Photos / Videos
Visit us on Facebook
Today's Birthdays
CHUBS
Recent Gallery Pix
hatchery steelhead
Hatchery Releases into the Pacific and Harvest
Who's Online
1 registered (stonefish), 1114 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
John Boob, Lawrence, I'm Still RichG, feyt, Freezeout
11498 Registered Users
Top Posters
Todd 28170
Dan S. 17149
Sol Duc 16138
The Moderator 14486
Salmo g. 13521
eyeFISH 12766
STRIKE ZONE 12107
Dogfish 10979
ParaLeaks 10513
Jerry Garcia 9160
Forum Stats
11498 Members
16 Forums
63773 Topics
645302 Posts

Max Online: 3001 @ 01/28/20 02:48 PM

Join the PP forums.

It's quick, easy, and always free!

Working for the fish and our future fishing opportunities:

The Wild Steelhead Coalition

The Photo & Video Gallery. Nearly 1200 images from our fishing trips! Tips, techniques, live weight calculator & more in the Fishing Resource Center. The time is now to get prime dates for 2018 Olympic Peninsula Winter Steelhead , don't miss out!.

| HOME | ALASKA FISHING | WASHINGTON FISHING | RIVER REPORTS | FORUMS | FISHING RESOURCE CENTER | CHARTER RATES | CONTACT US | WHAT ABOUT BOB? | PHOTO & VIDEO GALLERY | LEARN ABOUT THE FISH | RECIPES | SITE HELP & FAQ |