I was down there and at times on the verge of a nervous breakdown.
The smoke screens and lies and propaganda presnted by the WDFW Staff was appauling.
Some observations:
The consensus seemed to be that the Commisioners that voted against Proposal 1, voted against it because they did not believe in blanket management and secondly because they did not want to send the wrong message to the Public in that they did not want to come across to the Public that they did not have confidence in the WDFW biologists and policies.
It did seem though that the Commisioners that voted for Proposal 1, voted that way because of what the
WSC White Paper presented to them. They actually quoted the science that the WSC presented to them as the reason they voted for Proposal 1.
And I did learn today, that even though 61% in the Anglers Prefrence Study wanted statewide WSR, eventhough 80% of the emails and snailmail and phone calls prior to December 8 were from those in favor of statewide WSR, eventhough 80% of the those who testified in Vancouver where in favor of statewide WSR and eventhough on Thursday when the Commision recieved over 330 emails and all but a couple were in favor of statewide WSR,
We are the minority...We are the special intrest groupIt may be very hard to ever sway those that voted against Proposal 1 today. They seemed pretty set in stone on the issue and did not seem open to anything that was presented by the WSC and those in favor of statewide WSR. Their reasons behind not voting on for Proposal 1 were riddled with 'buts.'
The Commisioners that were in favor of statewide WSR argued that if we discovered that Proposal 1 did not help out wild steelhead populations, we could always go back to current management. They argued that there was nothing wrong with siding on the side of caution..."But we cant make the Department look bad..."
Anyways, I am beginingg to ramble. I am going to write a letter to those on the Commision who supported Proposal 1 and thank them for their support. R.P Van Gytenbeek did what ever he could to sway the vote down there and it is much apprecieted...he made an excellent speach to open the discussion but the Commisioners opposed to it wouldn't listen.
If you would like to have further info on Commision members and most importantly, when their terms expire (most important are Roehll's, White's, Shiosaki's, Ozment's and Cahill's) please visit...
WDFW Fish Commision And I encourage you to send emails and voice your opinion and DO NOT forget to send letters of gratitude to those who supported our cause i.e. Gytenbeek, Pelly, Reynolds and Tuck.
I would also like to thank the WSC BOD and especially President Duggan Harman, his effort and dedication is more then admirable and I believe all of us in support of statewide WSR have a debt of gratitude they owe these guys...THANK YOU!!