trump's tax cut

Posted by: larryb

trump's tax cut - 04/26/17 04:09 PM

what is the difference between trump's tax cut and the one bush did that put the economy into the crapper?
Posted by: Todd

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/26/17 07:12 PM

Well, this one is Bigly.

That's what.

Fish on...

Todd
Posted by: Sol Duc

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/26/17 07:19 PM

Nice seeing you back Todd, did you take a sabbatical ?
Posted by: Todd

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/26/17 07:20 PM

Nah, no sabbatical. Just overwhelmingly busy, and not seeing too much to comment on here lol smile

Fish on...

Todd
Posted by: Sol Duc

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/26/17 07:27 PM

I hear ya, you haven't missed much.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/26/17 09:03 PM

Originally Posted By: larryb
what is the difference between trump's tax cut and the one bush did that put the economy into the crapper?


There's a lot actually. The economy was already in the crapper when Dubya took office (dot com bust). Bush's tax cuts were designed as short term financial relief for all tax brackets (it had an original expiration date that was extended). It was a true temporary cut instead of a systemic restructuring of the tax code. It mostly benefited the rich, as 2x more households filed as millionaires from 2001 to 2006. It was the largest single contributor to the deficit @ $1.8T from 2002 - 2009. It added $1.6T to our debt. It brought the AMT out of obscurity. It kicked the can down the road and Bush, being the big govt Neo-con that he was, added crap ton to the overall debt by way of bloated government (creation of DHS etc.) and an entirely unnecessary war.

The economy at the end of Bush's term was not bad because of his tax cuts, it was bad because of the housing market crash. Once the dot com bubble burst, most everyone left the stormy market for a calmer bay (housing). The Dems sealed the deal with making sure everyone got a house. Everyone in DC was complicit and an accessory to the crime.

Conversely, Trump was handed a relatively stable, but not a growing economy. Last year's tax receipts were at an all time high, but wages are going nowhere. Trump's plan is a lot more about the tax code for both personal and business and its permanent. Its meant to greatly simplify the overall code while spurring business investment.

I'm still processing the implications, but here's the basics:

Business Tax from 35% to 15% (it would be a miracle if he gets 15%)

From seven personal tax brackets down to 3. 10%, 25% and 35%

Doubling the standard deduction, but elimination of all deductions other than Mortgage Interest and Charity

10% income bracket couples would pay no tax on their first $24k

Elimination of the AMT and Death Tax

On the surface, I love all of it. It would give a break to the top earners (of course), but it totally restructures how the second and third brackets manage their taxes. I'd go from 29% down to 25%, so that's cool. It would put a LOT of CPA's and Tax Lawyers out of business. One or two page filing. Top earners would game the system and become instant employees of their own businesses overnight (that's both good and bad thing).

I'm most excited about the the 15% business tax. Trillions of Corporate tax dollars are being held offshore (MS, Apple, Google, Amazon to name a few). Ireland doesn't like this plan at all. We are the world's largest consumer of retail goods. If he can get 15%, we'll have the largest jobs and economy growth seen since the Industrial Revolution. Every company in the world would set up shop in the USA almost overnight. Alibaba v. Amazon? Foxconn in Ohio? MS Ireland closing up shop? Yes please. We would have more choice and our dollar would go much, much further.

My guess is he'll negotiate to 20 - 22.5% and call it a win (if he can even get that). Still, even 20% would spur a BIGLY amount of growth. We shall see I guess...

PS: Paul Ryan will fvck it up.
Posted by: Salmo g.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 08:24 AM

Good synopsis Nick!
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 04:21 PM

Grew the economy right into a recession.

Impressive feat.
Posted by: Sol Duc

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 07:53 PM

Bush was elected into a recession.
Posted by: erikj

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 08:04 PM

Huh?
Posted by: Sol Duc

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 08:50 PM

Thanks to greenie super-low interest rates Greenspan brought in the early 2000s and his long-standing disdain for regulation are now held up as leading causes of the mortgage crisis.

He should have raised them gradually ( admittedly), but didn't. Sounds like we are now repeating history.
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 09:45 PM

lol

You're a big fan of regulation now?
Posted by: Sol Duc

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 11:03 PM

That was greenies words, not mine. Pay attention. wink
Posted by: Steelheadman

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/27/17 11:13 PM

Originally Posted By: Hankster
Originally Posted By: NickD90
Originally Posted By: larryb
what is the difference between trump's tax cut and the one bush did that put the economy into the crapper?


There's a lot actually. The economy was already in the crapper when Dubya took office (dot com bust). Bush's tax cuts were designed as short term financial relief for all tax brackets (it had an original expiration date that was extended). It was a true temporary cut instead of a systemic restructuring of the tax code. It mostly benefited the rich, as 2x more households filed as millionaires from 2001 to 2006. It was the largest single contributor to the deficit @ $1.8T from 2002 - 2009. It added $1.6T to our debt. It brought the AMT out of obscurity. It kicked the can down the road and Bush, being the big govt Neo-con that he was, added crap ton to the overall debt by way of bloated government (creation of DHS etc.) and an entirely unnecessary war.

The economy at the end of Bush's term was not bad because of his tax cuts, it was bad because of the housing market crash. Once the dot com bubble burst, most everyone left the stormy market for a calmer bay (housing). The Dems sealed the deal with making sure everyone got a house. Everyone in DC was complicit and an accessory to the crime.

Conversely, Trump was handed a relatively stable, but not a growing economy. Last year's tax receipts were at an all time high, but wages are going nowhere. Trump's plan is a lot more about the tax code for both personal and business and its permanent. Its meant to greatly simplify the overall code while spurring business investment.

I'm still processing the implications, but here's the basics:

Business Tax from 35% to 15% (it would be a miracle if he gets 15%)

From seven personal tax brackets down to 3. 10%, 25% and 35%

Doubling the standard deduction, but elimination of all deductions other than Mortgage Interest and Charity

10% income bracket couples would pay no tax on their first $24k

Elimination of the AMT and Death Tax

On the surface, I love all of it. It would give a break to the top earners (of course), but it totally restructures how the second and third brackets manage their taxes. I'd go from 29% down to 25%, so that's cool. It would put a LOT of CPA's and Tax Lawyers out of business. One or two page filing. Top earners would game the system and become instant employees of their own businesses overnight (that's both good and bad thing).

I'm most excited about the the 15% business tax. Trillions of Corporate tax dollars are being held offshore (MS, Apple, Google, Amazon to name a few). Ireland doesn't like this plan at all. We are the world's largest consumer of retail goods. If he can get 15%, we'll have the largest jobs and economy growth seen since the Industrial Revolution. Every company in the world would set up shop in the USA almost overnight. Alibaba v. Amazon? Foxconn in Ohio? MS Ireland closing up shop? Yes please. We would have more choice and our dollar would go much, much further.

My guess is he'll negotiate to 20 - 22.5% and call it a win (if he can even get that). Still, even 20% would spur a BIGLY amount of growth. We shall see I guess...

PS: Paul Ryan will fvck it up.

Any deficit is proof gubmint spends too much and not that it isn't taxing enough. It was better to have that $1.8 trillion in the pockets of taxpayers than in the wasteful hands of gubmint.

The Bush tax cuts came in two stages in 2001 and 2003. Before them the dot com bursting bubble had the economy moving along at about a 1% growth rate.
After them the economy grew by 3.8% in 2004 and 3.3% in 2005.

Obamanomics has the economy struggling to reach a 2% average rate of growth. It didn't ever have a one-year growth rate of 3% or better.

It's past time to change that.


No a deficit is proof that somebody isn't paying their fair share. Frigging billionaires like Trump and Buffett spend little to nothing on federal income tax. It's like welfare for the rich. Trump wants to increase taxes on the middle tax and give rich old farts like himself a tax break. No wonder you couldn't get into the Stanford School of Economics Hank.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 07:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Steelheadman

No a deficit is proof that somebody isn't paying their fair share. Frigging billionaires like Trump and Buffett spend little to nothing on federal income tax. It's like welfare for the rich. Trump wants to increase taxes on the middle tax and give rich old farts like himself a tax break. No wonder you couldn't get into the Stanford School of Economics Hank.


Sort of, but not really. What is a "fair share" and who determines that?

It takes money (and a good tax lawyer) to make money. As Maddow showed, in 2005 Trump paid $38M in taxes on $150M in earned income (25%) whereas Sanders paid 14% in 2014. Buffet paid around 11% in 2010. Most rich folk actively work to reduce their effective rate as much as possible. That is not a new thing. Nobody is stopping anyone from paying as much as they want to. The IRS will gladly take overpayments. To add, Trump will likely never recoup his campaign expenditures merely from tax cuts alone. The argument that he is doing this to give himself a tax break is rather invalid when he's already spent more to become President than he can recover from just tax breaks.

Zero or reduced deficits are achieved one of two ways. Either reduce government spending to match receipts OR increase tax receipts to match current levels of spending. Trump has reduced the deficit by over $100B in his first 2 months by reducing spending. Billy Clinton did the same when he and Newt worked together to balance the budget.

It all boils down to big government v. small government and it always starts with spending (not revenues). Taxes always play catch up and are adjusted up or down based on what the greater government vision is at the time of implementation (if at all). Bush II and Obama couldn't help themselves at the trough. Clinton and Trump have exercised a bit more restraint.

Trump's plan does call for elimination of the death tax ($5M+) which does help the rich, but it also eliminates capital gains (mostly a wash). Trump's plan does remove things like child care tax credits which hurt lower income families, but it also doesn't tax the first $24K in low income (another wash). Trump's personal tax plan will ONLY work if he also gets the business rate that he's after while keeping spending in control. Something has to make up the difference in lost receipts. That something is less government spending and more business investment (quasi business Trickle Down via investment). It'll work if he doesn't get us into another stupid war (TBD).

Again, Trump's plan is about simplification and cuts across the board for all brackets - which has been badly needed regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum. It hasn't been attempted by a sitting President in years and for that I applaud him.

Lastly, you are making be defend Trump. That sucks. He's an ass, but the man has the best business chops of any President we've had in office in our lifetimes. I trust that he knows a hell of lot more about taxes than either you or I, seeing how he paid more in one year than all of us combined across our lifetimes.

PS: Turn off NPR and write a bigger check next year. Pay whatever you feel is your fair share, which I assume would be more than you are obligated. Moral superiority achieved. Problem solved.

Posted by: erikj

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 08:53 AM

Love me some NPR, but I think they're little worried about budget cuts.
I think you're reading a slightly different source regarding Trump's tax plan than I did. Actually, I like your analysis better than the few I read. Care to share the links?
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 09:28 AM

My inference comes from all over the net and has some gaps filled accordingly to make some sense here as I see it. I'm no economist and just a Joe-Blow taxpayer. Someone with more knowledge could probably do a better job than I can at breaking it down (and could probably correct any of my misinterpretations along the way).

Wikipedia, Forbes, The Economist, Wall Street Journal, Zero Hedge, Times among others are my general sources. I try to divorce politics from my own internal analysis and conclusions and read everything I can whether or not I agree with the politics behind it. Presidents from both parties come and go. Some politicians are big government and some are small government. The D or R next to their name usually matters little. Bush II was a hog. Clinton was not. The exact opposite of what everyone expects when a D or and R shows up next to names.

I'm all for smaller government in our current financial climate. I'm all for running the government like an actual business. We are $20T in debt with another $80 - 100T in unfunded liabilities because we haven't been running it like a business. Cutting fat is what smart businessmen and women do in times like these. They pull into port and mend their ship's sails.

NPR's inefficient budget should be the least of our worries. They should survive in the open market just like anyone else and pay salaries based on what the market can bear (they weren't). Cutting the deficit by $100B in his first few months is Trump being smart with our money. Sorry NPR, those are the breaks when you pay on-air talent 2x what the open market dictates.
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 09:29 AM

Government isn't business. Pretending they're the same is fuckin stupid.

But whatever.

I'm about done giving a sh!t either way, as everyone seems more interested in being political cock gobblers than doing what helps the country.

Party first. Country second.

Great.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 10:35 AM

C'mon guys - you two are much too smart for that and I mean that.

To pretend it isn't a business is ludicrous. Please explain how it is not a business and show your work.

Revenues and expenditures. Money in, money out. Providing a consumable service while paying salaries to employees. It is the very definition of a business.

The only major difference between a government and a business, is that you are forced through taxation to buy services from the government (captured market) and money can be printed to cover immediate losses (devaluation of the dollar). In the open market, nobody forces anyone to buy from any certain business and money has to be made rather than printed. That's it. Other than that, they financially operate in exactly the same way. Money in and money out.

Not treating it like a business is EXACTLY how we find ourselves $20T in debt with another $80 - 100T in liabilities. As Thatcher put it, what happens when you run out of other people's money? Either as a business or a government, you go broke when that happens. See Venezuela right now and Yugoslavia before it. Ironically, Venezuela could immediately right their ship and become the largest economy in SA if they properly utilized the very one product of value they have that matters. Their natural resources and reserves. Their political system is preventing that, not the math of running a business.

I deal with stats all day long and I can make the numbers say whatever my Leadership wants them to say. Math is math. It's settled science. Either you are going broke, staying static or you are increasing your bottom line. Math has nothing to do with politics. It's the policies behind the math that people fight over, but the math itself doesn't change.

It's ok to not agree with me. You'd just be wrong is all. grin
Posted by: Bent Metal

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 10:58 AM

Nick, in business there are two main factors.....Competition and Profit... They are both interrelated.
Are the American people employees or customers? If the objective is to profit off its customers (us) then mission accomplished. The least they can do is tell me they love me before taxing the fuk out of me.
Posted by: erikj

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 11:21 AM

Please edit the trillions in liability from your post. I'm not a fan of facts getting in the way of perceptive.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 11:30 AM

BM - it's not static and you are basing your claim off the assumption that it is. It changes about every 8 years. It's driven by politics, not math (see my above many points). Also don't confuse the competition vs. forced taxation (captured market) debate with the actual money on hand. How it was earned is irrelevant to what the books say. I.e. the books don't care how you got the money, just that the money is there and more of it is coming (government or business - doesn't matter). Finance and math are amoral. Stats don't lie, statisticians do.

The core foundation of our government is that American people are the customers and not the other way around. "We the people" make up the government and it serves at our pleasure. We have the documentation to prove it.

Conversely, see Venezuela as an example of a system where the people are "employees" of the state. We are paying (taxes) for services rendered (benefits returned aka product). If we don't like it, we can elect someone who is more inline with our beliefs and visions. That's your competition in government right there. Elections. IT IS a business and WE ARE the customers.

Some Americans happen to work for government, but that is a side bar topic.

It's who's in office that drives the policies that sets your effective tax rate.

In the global business world, if you were Microsoft, would you rather pay 20% in Ireland or 35% in the USA? What if the USA offered you 15%? Would you take it?

Of course you would.

Except Steelheadman, who would gladly pay his fair share @ 35% because that's the right thing to do. rolleyes

Posted by: The Trumpster

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 11:35 AM

Originally Posted By: NickD90
I'm no economist and just a Joe-Blow taxpayer.


I'm not even either of those things, so it sounds like you are more qualified than I am.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 11:38 AM

Originally Posted By: The Trumpster
Originally Posted By: NickD90
I'm no economist and just a Joe-Blow taxpayer.


I'm not even either of those things, so it sounds like you are more qualified than I am.


Hire me? One million dollars. About 10x what I'm worth on the open market, but it's a gubment gig so who cares imiright? moose
Posted by: erikj

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 11:40 AM

Best of luck.
We need your tax dollars. See above.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 12:09 PM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_rates

Of course they don't. They book it offshore in Ireland. grin

The flat rate is near 35% but with creative tax accounting, but it is true that most medium to large corporations do not pay the full 35%. Most that can't or don't offshore pay around 25-27% at the end of the day - give or take. It's in their best interest NOT to pay the full 35%. Creative tax accounting 101.

Good healthy chat guys...as always...gotta run.
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 12:57 PM

Originally Posted By: NickD90
C'mon guys - you two are much too smart for that and I mean that.

To pretend it isn't a business is ludicrous. Please explain how it is not a business and show you work


Shut the fvck up. You're just making yourself look stupid.

Governments do things businesses would never dream of and is way more complicated than business.

Did IBM launch a nuclear attack against Microsoft? Does General Motors dictate fiscal policy and set interest rates? Does Amazon offer property to homestead? Does Sportco set fishing seasons? Does Apple have Apple State University? Does anyone serve in the General Electric Navy? Has anyone appeared before the Supreme Court of McDonald's?

It's like you're being stupid intentionally.
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 02:04 PM

I'm waiting to hear about Boeing's quantitative easing plan.

Do you guys think Airbus can defeat ISIS, and how effective will their sanctions against North Korea be?
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 02:40 PM

Originally Posted By: Dan S.
Originally Posted By: NickD90
C'mon guys - you two are much too smart for that and I mean that.

To pretend it isn't a business is ludicrous. Please explain how it is not a business and show you work


Shut the fvck up. You're just making yourself look stupid.

Governments do things businesses would never dream of and is way more complicated than business.

Did IBM launch a nuclear attack against Microsoft? Does General Motors dictate fiscal policy and set interest rates? Does Amazon offer property to homestead? Does Sportco set fishing seasons? Does Apple have Apple State University? Does anyone serve in the General Electric Navy? Has anyone appeared before the Supreme Court of McDonald's?

It's like you're being stupid intentionally.



Dan - all of those items are services (or products) bought by our tax dollars. Yes, even nuking other countries is considered a service. Defense, welfare, BLM, education....all of it is a product. Tax money in, services out. I already talked about printing money and the Fed is it's own standalone entity (but you already knew that). Nothing that you said proves that the government does not or should not operate like a business. But thanks for the Strawmen arguments
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 02:59 PM

You already talked out your ass is what you did, junior.

No fuckin business in the world pays for non productive sh!t like welfare, or does things fpr the common good or public safety, dumbfuck, so stop pretending they do. Only regulations passed by the government keep them from doing exactly the opposite. Put the fuckin paste down and stop eating it.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 03:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Dan S.
You already talked out your ass is what you did, junior.

No fuckin business in the world pays for non productive sh!t like welfare, or does things fpr the common good or public safety, dumbfuck, so stop pretending they do.


I would argue that in the engineering and construction world "BIM" is about as non-productive as it gets and only benefits the downstream users
Posted by: Sol Duc

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 04:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Dan S.
Government isn't business. Pretending they're the same is fuckin stupid.

But whatever.

I'm about done giving a sh!t either way, as everyone seems more interested in being political cock gobblers than doing what helps the country.

Party first. Country second.

Great.

We're in a civil war.
Posted by: Steelheadman

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 05:28 PM

Trump said he was going to rebuild America's infrastructure. I doubt it is going to be in the budget. Oh yeah and who is going to pay for the wall. Donald thought this job was going to be easier.
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/28/17 06:05 PM

laugh
Posted by: Dan S.

Re: trump's tax cut - 04/29/17 10:14 AM

smile
Posted by: gooybob

Re: trump's tax cut - 05/02/17 01:50 PM

Originally Posted By: NickD90
Originally Posted By: larryb
what is the difference between trump's tax cut and the one bush did that put the economy into the crapper?


There's a lot actually. The economy was already in the crapper when Dubya took office (dot com bust). Bush's tax cuts were designed as short term financial relief for all tax brackets (it had an original expiration date that was extended). It was a true temporary cut instead of a systemic restructuring of the tax code. It mostly benefited the rich, as 2x more households filed as millionaires from 2001 to 2006. It was the largest single contributor to the deficit @ $1.8T from 2002 - 2009. It added $1.6T to our debt. It brought the AMT out of obscurity. It kicked the can down the road and Bush, being the big govt Neo-con that he was, added crap ton to the overall debt by way of bloated government (creation of DHS etc.) and an entirely unnecessary war.

The economy at the end of Bush's term was not bad because of his tax cuts, it was bad because of the housing market crash. Once the dot com bubble burst, most everyone left the stormy market for a calmer bay (housing). The Dems sealed the deal with making sure everyone got a house. Everyone in DC was complicit and an accessory to the crime.

Conversely, Trump was handed a relatively stable, but not a growing economy. Last year's tax receipts were at an all time high, but wages are going nowhere. Trump's plan is a lot more about the tax code for both personal and business and its permanent. Its meant to greatly simplify the overall code while spurring business investment.

I'm still processing the implications, but here's the basics:

Business Tax from 35% to 15% (it would be a miracle if he gets 15%)

From seven personal tax brackets down to 3. 10%, 25% and 35%

Doubling the standard deduction, but elimination of all deductions other than Mortgage Interest and Charity

10% income bracket couples would pay no tax on their first $24k

Elimination of the AMT and Death Tax

On the surface, I love all of it. It would give a break to the top earners (of course), but it totally restructures how the second and third brackets manage their taxes. I'd go from 29% down to 25%, so that's cool. It would put a LOT of CPA's and Tax Lawyers out of business. One or two page filing. Top earners would game the system and become instant employees of their own businesses overnight (that's both good and bad thing).

I'm most excited about the the 15% business tax. Trillions of Corporate tax dollars are being held offshore (MS, Apple, Google, Amazon to name a few). Ireland doesn't like this plan at all. We are the world's largest consumer of retail goods. If he can get 15%, we'll have the largest jobs and economy growth seen since the Industrial Revolution. Every company in the world would set up shop in the USA almost overnight. Alibaba v. Amazon? Foxconn in Ohio? MS Ireland closing up shop? Yes please. We would have more choice and our dollar would go much, much further.

My guess is he'll negotiate to 20 - 22.5% and call it a win (if he can even get that). Still, even 20% would spur a BIGLY amount of growth. We shall see I guess...

PS: Paul Ryan will fvck it up.

Right about Ryan. He was born a fvck up and a butt licker and a vampire. This tax plan is just a re-hash of trickle down economics. It NEVER works. It just widens the gap between the middle class and the top 3%. If you think for one minute that corporate America is going to pass the tax savings along to the consumer think again. Did the airlines pass the enormous fuel savings down the line to the consumer? No, they just paid the top management more and charged more fees. When the oil companies were having record profits did they pass the savings on to the consumer? Nope, but their top management reaped in huge bonuses and perks. Remember, Donald Chump has everything to gain from his tax plan personally as well as his suspect businesses. This "president" has lied and failed to come through on all of his bullsh!t promises and it will just continue. I would list all of his 100 day failures but it could overwhelm this website and cause it to crash.




Posted by: BroodBuster

Re: trump's tax cut - 05/02/17 02:03 PM

And this years budget is different than last years how? Oh yea, we're buying more bombs.

America, PhuckYea!
Posted by: DrifterWA

Re: trump's tax cut - 05/02/17 07:34 PM

Let's see.....build up the armed forces, once built then "flex are muscles"...get the country into another conflict.....I sure hope not!!!!!
Posted by: WDFW X 1 = 0

Re: trump's tax cut - 05/03/17 10:45 AM

I hope he kicks North Korea in the nuts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: NickD90

Re: trump's tax cut - 05/03/17 05:07 PM

Originally Posted By: WDFW X 1 = 0
I hope he kicks North Korea in the nuts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I really don't want to see another war at ALL - but the little NK fat boy is going to need to be dealt with sooner rather than later - IMO. Not a good choice. We really need China to take him out and replace the regime peacefully.
Posted by: WDFW X 1 = 0

Re: trump's tax cut - 05/04/17 08:42 AM

"I really don't want to see another war at ALL"

Close your eyes and hold on.