interesting..

https://insider.si.edu/2012/03/ice-age-m...-north-america/

It is interesting, actually they have known this for some time, they already had connected that the Clovis points were technology from europe and not asia some time ago. Also I saw an episode of "America Unearthed (Scott Wolters? History Chanel) a few years back where he went to a swamp in Florida where ancient european style burials had taken place, both the skeletal morphology was european as well as the artifacts excavated, DNA was blocked in court by the local tribes I think. Anyways the gravesites were 11,000 yrs+. He went to the Smithsonian and interviewed a forensic pathologist or an archaeologist who admitted on camera that the Smithsonian had known for 30 years that Europeans were the first to migrate to America 15,000+ years ago.

This is just not something that the MSM likes to talk about as the tribes accross the country get offended regarding this topic

". . . the tribes accross the country get offended regarding this topic . . ."

What's to be offended about? Either Europeans or Asians from 11,000 years ago were both primitive peoples. It's not like it could or would affect any native ancestral claim to being the "first Americans."

It IS interesting how the MSM buries this news of the morphology of the earliest residents of North America. It is was the morphology of any other continents' people, it would be front-page news.

This is clearly an attack on the white man. Just like the reverse racism we have to deal with every day of our lives.

We should definitely end treaty fishing rights based on these findings, too. It wouldn't hurt to take back all the reservation lands, too.

if it were signed under false pretenses, then thats exactly what should happen...

ive always found it odd that people, have for hundreds of years said they were "first"...

who did the DNA and carbon dating 500 years ago? how about even 200 years ago?

theres also other things that have came into play, that are newer than the original article that show the possibility that the first humans actually came from Europe and not Africa... they found remains in the Balkans that are 7.2 million years old...

interesting for sure...

https://news.artsci.utoronto.ca/all-news...emains-balkans/

This post has only a few posts, and is already full of lol.

Fish on...

Todd

I liked this post better when there were no replies.

fvck you Helsper, you arent anything but a drunk landscaper hack... go fvck yourself...


if you are going to say some bullsh!t like that, you need to have an argument towards the original article...

so 1, argue a university, and argue the Smithsonian...

THEN, call me a racist, so i can rip your old ass up once again....

lol

Exactly...

Oh yeah,quite the paradigm shift . What difference does it make?

racist against who?

go ahead, ill wait....

Just found it interesting Rob, that's all... Figured we could talk about something here with substance, not looking good tho....

Funny... Pretty sure I'm part "Indian" since a grandparent married a Cherokee.. that's just one side, that I know of lol...


Try again tater...

Indian is not the preferred nomnclature...Native American,please...

If that were the case there wouldn't be the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission...

Donny,you're out of your element...

Slowly, as if unable to control her own urges, Pancake Nipples began to dance around the fire.

Evo, almost nothing in mankind’s world is congruent. Only nieve dumbfooks like you would be surprised to find out otherwise. The world is complex and ugly, and because of our new age of communication, people like you can share your naivety with us. The system does not stop for even a moment, because something doesn’t add up, in fact our society is designed to keep going despite incongruences.

So some Indians sold their land to the USA in the form of a treaty a long time ago and some whites may have been here before that. The dealings are written in law. That is it, end of story.

That's a pretty stupid statement...

Are you saying that modern science cannot prove history wrong?

If that's the case, you must be taking about yourself...

Yeah.

That's what he said.



Wait...................no, it isn't.

Well then I'm confused...

That should be your sig line.

I'm not familiar with Clovis points.. I found the article interesting...

How can you not get that?

Can we stop saying yer? It's not endearing like y'all.

It's why I posted it genius...

Because the only thing he gets is a government check that puts him on the internet where he can inflate his ego. Pseudoknowledge is all Evo has, all Google, no wisdom.

prove that i get a check from the government...

and if i were all Google, i would have googled more and not posted the sh!t on here to actually learn about...

so far the only person that has provided and substance to this post is RICH....


you obviously dont have enough wisdom to lend, you just need to resort to your regularly scheduled bullsh!t....

Pancake Nipples paused and gazed at her mate through the thick, pungent smoke.

we call this one chick i knew McGriddle T.itties (seriously guys?)... she decided it would be cool to flash the bar one night... bitches tits looked like McGriddle flapjacks with cinnamon swirls...

gross...

Mrs. Butterworths

Post a pic..

Post up McGriddle Tits

I used to have sexy times with a hot little number that had a smaller set of nipples directly on top of her normal nipples. They had more of a Log Cabin taste.

I also went to college with a guy that had legit vestigial nipples running down his chest like a damned dog. The extra ones weren't fully formed regular nips, but sure as chit, that sumbitch had 2 full rows. He was the kind of guy who always took his shirt off at parties and such. It was some fvcked up repugnant chit.

She blocked me on Facebook...

Skeeted in her eye one night and apparently she didn't like that...

Well that and she's a kook....

Mother of God...

nah, her name is Jolene, not Mary....

The world needs good nudity not slag mattress nasty beotches