Sealed indictments
Posted by: Anonymous
Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 01:18 PM
https://qposts.online/assets/images/ad59...d264bd2a7aa.jpgNormal numbers for a year is less than 1000 sealed indictments. there are 40,000+ listed in this document.
Don't tell me there is not something big going on.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 02:03 PM
No, but there are a number every year which are sealed for various reasons and later unsealed. The amount in the last year is unprecedented.
John Hubber US Attorney out of Utah and his team are the group behind the sealed indictments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_W._HuberHuber speaks directly to Sessions and has the ability to form a grand jury unlike like the IG who speaks to Rod Rosenstein. When Sessions recused himself he appointed Huber in his place. Huber's office is in Utah far away from DC and can issue indictments in any state.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 02:10 PM
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 02:14 PM
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:02 PM
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:10 PM
https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1022579453799620613Undercover Huber‏ @JohnWHuber
Follow Follow @JohnWHuber
 More
"Undercover Huber Retweeted Josh Lederman
Q: In 2018, when did the Democratic campaign to retake the house fall apart?
A:
1. What is MS-13?
2. What is "Crumbs"?
3. What is "Ocasio-Cortez"?
4. What is All Of The Above?"
Q, "know our coms",,,,, Huber is retweeting "Q" coms in this tweet.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:12 PM
https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1025438543026499584This is a pretty bold public announcement from an impartial public servant.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:14 PM
Are you awake yet?
Posted by: Todd
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:15 PM
You know that's not John Huber, right, just some dude with a twitter handle?
qposts lol
Fish on...
Todd
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:29 PM
It says its not really him but that does not mean that it isn't. If he says that it isn't him he has plausible deniability.
Posted by: Todd
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 03:57 PM
Or...it's not him.
That kinda actually makes the most sense.
Kinda lame for conspiracies, though.
Fish on...
Todd
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 04:01 PM
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/03/18 04:03 PM
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1025442755600891904/photo/1Above is the most recent direct "Q" drop from 8chan, open the second link posted above and scroll down the twitter feed, who is posting? Coincidence?
But wait, the one above has "undercover Huber" scrubbed out, but the original has his post,,, see here.
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 08:08 AM
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 08:10 AM
Posted by: Jason Beezuz
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 08:50 AM
Dont use twitter to get news you re-re wing doodle!
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 11:13 AM
"Dont use twitter to get news you re-re wing doodle!"
So we know that these indictments are for real, 50x more than the average, so something big is going on regarding mass arrests.
So who do you all think these indictments are for?
Based on the supporting circumstances I suspect most of these indictments are for government employees, a combination of elected officials, appointed officials, prosecutors, judges and cops with a smattering of top echelon business executives.
What are the indictments for? likely conspiracy charges for the most part, tax fraud, human trafficking, pedophilia, murder, rape, embezzlement.
Follow the connections between all of the DC resignations and their constituents back in their home states. Who are their friends back home?
Posted by: GoldDigger
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 11:43 AM
J.F.C. Rich....get a life!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 12:01 PM
"J.F.C. Rich....get a life!!!!!!"
This is very important and well worth the time spent attempting to educate people.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 12:05 PM
I bet you that "child molester" Ed Murray is on the list as well as some of his close friends who work for the city of Seattle. Good chance our Governor is on the list as well.
Murray worked for the same law firm as the one who represents the Clintons in Uranium 1. Coincidence?
Perkins Coie is the law firm that Hillary and the DNC hired during the election... Perkins Coie was paid over 9 million dollars by them and the DNC...
Perkins Coie was the one that hired Crowdstrike...
Perkins Coie are also the ones the hired Fusion GPS, which gave us the fake dossier...
Perkins Coie is headquartered in Seattle, and is the largest and oldest (started in 1912) law firm in the Pacific Northwest....
oh, and Robert Bauer, left Perkins Coie earlier this year... he had been a partner for over 40 years....
coincidentally, he was also Obama's White House Counsel....
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/04/18 01:39 PM
the web is big and sticky.
Posted by: Dan S.
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/05/18 12:46 PM
Posted by: Black Bart
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/05/18 03:18 PM
Rich, I've been following your posts for several years now, never chimed in, just pretty much enjoying the ride.
Now Rich ... I only have one question for you.
..... How much longer will you be visiting earth ?
Just curious.
Posted by: Jason Beezuz
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/05/18 04:10 PM
Question: how many credible sources of information were posted in this thread?
Answer: zero
https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/Perkins Coie is an international law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington, and founded in 1912. It is the oldest and largest law firm headquartered in the Pacific Northwest and has a total of 19 offices across the United States and Asia. In addition to corporate representation, the firm often represents political clients.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkins_Coie
you were saying?
dipsh!t....
He is a partner at Perkins Coie. In November 2009, he was named to be the next White House Counsel,[2] upon the resignation of Gregory Craig.[3] Bauer was President Obama's personal attorney and the general counsel of the Obama for America presidential campaign prior to his appointment as White House Counsel. He has also previously served as the general counsel to the Democratic National Committee,[4] and had advised President Obama since Mr. Obama came to Washington, D.C. in 2005 as U. S. Senator.[5]
As general counsel for the 2008 campaign, Bauer asked the Justice Department to investigate the officers and donors of American Issues Project after it ran a negative ad about Obama.[6]
On Thursday, June 2, 2011, the White House Press Office stated that Bauer would be returning to private practice at Perkins Coie, and that Principal Deputy Counsel to the President Kathryn Ruemmler (his deputy, in that office since January 2010 and before that since January 2009 as Principal Associate Deputy U.S. Attorney General) would succeed him. The position, because it is part of the Executive Office staff that personally advises the President and is not an agency or Cabinet department or military head, does not require Senate confirmation despite the prominence of the office.
Bauer returned to private practice to again represent the president's election team and the Democratic National Committee. "Bob was a critical member of the White House team," Mr. Obama said. "He has exceptional judgment, wisdom and intellect, and he will continue to be one of my close advisers."
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/05/18 09:26 PM
Nice work EVO!
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/10/18 12:34 PM
So in all honesty what does the consensus think this extreme amount of sealed indictments are all about? 50,000 is a huge amount 50x+ the amount in a normal year.
https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/population_statistics.jsp183,488 is the total federal prisoner population, so where are you going to put another 50,000 in one year?
Posted by: Todd
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/10/18 03:13 PM
You are skipping a few important questions before getting to "where to house all the new inmates"...
1. Why believe a conspiracy site?
2. Why believe Q?
3. Why believe there are 50,000 sealed indictments?
4. Why believe that even if there are 50,000 sealed indictments that 50,000 people will go to trial and either plead guilty or be found guilty?
5. Why believe that all of them will get jail time when they do?
The reason you always sound like such a kook is that when you "question" things, you only question the official story, and assume it is false...you gulp down everything else without ever questioning any of it...that's why your predictions of impending doom always fall completely flat.
Fish on...
Todd
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/10/18 03:41 PM
definitely not all of them will go to a grand jury and not all of them will go to jail but the 50,000 indictments are fact not conspiracy, the proof is not hard to find and the links have been posted on the dark side many times.
Posted by: Todd
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/10/18 03:45 PM
qposts is not "facts".
Hopefully this helps.
Fish on...
Todd
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/16/18 12:00 PM
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/cathol...s-20180814.htmlThe people you are told to trust the most...... Connections to UN, Clinton foundation, Haiti... Its all connected.
Did you notice that the Vatican has no comment regarding these indictments and revelations. There are no coincidences.
much more to come.
Posted by: The Moderator
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/16/18 12:04 PM
11-11-18
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/16/18 12:20 PM
"11-11-18"
Is that when your indictment will be made public?
Blow this place up and your life will be a bit more dull. Few places if any like this on the web.
Posted by: gooybob
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/16/18 03:03 PM
"Dont use twitter to get news you re-re wing doodle!"
So we know that these indictments are for real, 50x more than the average, so something big is going on regarding mass arrests.
So who do you all think these indictments are for?
Based on the supporting circumstances I suspect most of these indictments are for government employees, a combination of elected officials, appointed officials, prosecutors, judges and cops with a smattering of top echelon business executives.
What are the indictments for? likely conspiracy charges for the most part, tax fraud, human trafficking, pedophilia, murder, rape, embezzlement.
Follow the connections between all of the DC resignations and their constituents back in their home states. Who are their friends back home?
Hey Genius, how will you discredit this?
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/16/william-mcraven-security-clearance-request-779989
Posted by: Todd
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/16/18 03:20 PM
McRaven is going super double secret undercover, that's how.
Fish on...
Todd
Posted by: Dan S.
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/16/18 03:34 PM
You could have just stopped there.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/28/18 08:11 PM
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/29/18 07:43 PM
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government...pecial-counsel/50,000 sealed indictments Todd. He has been on it for some time and he has lots of help.
Posted by: Steelheadman
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/29/18 09:29 PM
This is a distraction! Way to gnome things up Rich.
Posted by: Todd
Re: Sealed indictments - 08/30/18 11:39 AM
Ask QAnon.
Fish on...
Todd