#434018 - 05/12/08 08:21 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: TBJ]
|
Spawner
Registered: 03/01/03
Posts: 661
Loc: Snohomish County
|
Here is my issue with CR spring Chinook fishery, admittedly a fishery I know very little about and have never participated in.....this is a fishery where they have the ability to know exactly how many fish are going over Bonneville. Instead of "forecasting" the run size, letting people pound them below Bonneville for X number of days, then saying Uh Oh, there's not enough fish we better shut it down, why not wait until enough fish have passed over the dam and THEN open it up....above the dam, below the dam, or both?
I've always felt the only fishery this state runs correctly (besides put and take lowland lake trout) is the Lake WA sockeye fishery. If enough fish don't enter the lake, the fishery is not opened. How hard is that? Due to the fact that they can count all the fish, don't they have that same ability on the Columbia?
Ike
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434031 - 05/12/08 09:58 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Jerry Garcia]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1036
Loc: AUBURN
|
More hatchery plants would mean more hatchery fish on the spawning grounds reducing the amount of wild fish spawning sucessfully meaning less wild fish coming back. I disagree!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434032 - 05/12/08 10:02 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Ikissmykiss]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1036
Loc: AUBURN
|
Here is my issue with CR spring Chinook fishery, admittedly a fishery I know very little about and have never participated in.....this is a fishery where they have the ability to know exactly how many fish are going over Bonneville. Instead of "forecasting" the run size, letting people pound them below Bonneville for X number of days, then saying Uh Oh, there's not enough fish we better shut it down, why not wait until enough fish have passed over the dam and THEN open it up....above the dam, below the dam, or both?
I've always felt the only fishery this state runs correctly (besides put and take lowland lake trout) is the Lake WA sockeye fishery. If enough fish don't enter the lake, the fishery is not opened. How hard is that? Due to the fact that they can count all the fish, don't they have that same ability on the Columbia?
Ike The Columbia River is completely different fishery to manage than Lake Washington Sockeye. They would not manage Lake Washington Sockeye this way if the Locks were at the Mouth of the Cedar River.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434034 - 05/12/08 10:04 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: jandlfishingguide]
|
Spawner
Registered: 10/09/04
Posts: 577
Loc: Napavine,Washington
|
JG I still think the way to ensure that NO hatchery fish get onto the spawning beds would be to erect a barrier dam like is on the Cowlitz on any river that has a native run. This with a fish sorting facility would all but insure no passage of non wild fish. I think we all pretty much agree the numbers of "wild" fish on most rivers are probably miss/non clipped hatchery origin fish. I was told once that the tribes were against clipping all hatchery fish. Does anyone know if this is the case?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434036 - 05/12/08 10:43 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Salmo g.]
|
Spawner
Registered: 03/01/03
Posts: 661
Loc: Snohomish County
|
As you can see and already know, fish management is as much or more about what people want than it is about what fish need. That's it in a nutshell, unfortunately. Let's let everybody have their wack at 'em before we know how many are coming back and worry about the welfare of the fish later.....sad. Jerry, the only comparison I was drawing between the two fisheries is the fish managers ability to know exactly how many fish are returning to the system. Ike
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434037 - 05/12/08 10:50 AM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: Salmo g.]
|
Carcass
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 2364
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Ikiss,
Yes, the ability to manage the Columbia spring chinook run that way is hypothetically possible, but it would ignore the desires of the LCR non-treaty commercial fleet and the LCR recreational fleet. No openings until an in season update based on fish over Bonneville would be very good for the wild fish. As you can see and already know, fish management is as much or more about what people want than it is about what fish need.
Sg Pull the LCR Commercial fisherman out of the river and there's a strong chance you'll see it managed this way. Another decent reason to keep the LCR Commercial fisherman fishing... Keith
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434075 - 05/12/08 02:36 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: laterun]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 1036
Loc: AUBURN
|
JG I still think the way to ensure that NO hatchery fish get onto the spawning beds would be to erect a barrier dam like is on the Cowlitz on any river that has a native run. This with a fish sorting facility would all but insure no passage of non wild fish. I think we all pretty much agree the numbers of "wild" fish on most rivers are probably miss/non clipped hatchery origin fish. I was told once that the tribes were against clipping all hatchery fish. Does anyone know if this is the case? Great idea but like Keith states, this would only work if the state cliped 100% of the hatchery fish. At the fish collection facility at Barrier they count misclipped hatchery fish as wild. So in this example hatchery fish with adipose fins are being trucked up river and released and released into the upper Cowlitz watershed.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434080 - 05/12/08 03:17 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: jandlfishingguide]
|
Spawner
Registered: 03/17/99
Posts: 554
Loc: Everett, WA USA
|
I was told by one of the bios. on the Kalama that the reason that not all fish are clipped is so that they can make sure they get back some fish. Check out the fish that return to the hatchery and you will see some fish with all their fins. A good example is the summer kings from the Wallace hatchery. Go check the creek below the weir and see if some of those fish have all their fins. The summer kings are all hatchery.
_________________________
"Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." Will Rogers
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434085 - 05/12/08 03:38 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: stever in everett]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 10/13/00
Posts: 3770
Loc: everett
|
it's a way that they can get an idea how many fish are caught in the ocean fisheries also.
_________________________
would the boy you were be proud of the man you are
Growing old ain't for wimps Lonnie Gane
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434124 - 05/12/08 08:02 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: stlhdr1]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/28/01
Posts: 279
Loc: olympia
|
everything's getting clipped on the LCR this year ....springers ..falls and coho....anybody not clip 30% of their springers from here on out is gonna be unemployed real quick....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434128 - 05/12/08 08:52 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: bodysurf]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/28/01
Posts: 279
Loc: olympia
|
also...the wallace river summers that aren't clipped are part of a double index tag group...tag a couple hundred thousand fish with one code and adipose clip them...then tag a couple hundred thousand with a different code and don't clip them to simulate "wild fish"...to see if people have been releasing unclipped fish... ...pretty sure all of puget sound and the coast are being mass marked too......
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434133 - 05/12/08 09:11 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: stlhdr1]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 1406
Loc: Bainbridge Island
|
Just curious, but if the hatchery got back mostly non biting fish because those were the majority of fish that made it back, would those genes affect the fishing for the fish returning from those stocks?
_________________________
I like the little way the line runs up the back of the stocking- Diamond Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434147 - 05/12/08 10:38 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: TBJ]
|
Carcass
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 2364
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Just curious, but if the hatchery got back mostly non biting fish because those were the majority of fish that made it back, would those genes affect the fishing for the fish returning from those stocks? I don't think there's a problem there, there's too many variances in what makes it back to the hatchery... Ie. early fish, big schools that show at once, days with little to no pressure, etc... Keith
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#434148 - 05/12/08 10:39 PM
Re: Bonneville Counts?
[Re: bodysurf]
|
Carcass
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 2364
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
everything's getting clipped on the LCR this year ....springers ..falls and coho....anybody not clip 30% of their springers from here on out is gonna be unemployed real quick.... If that's true I look forward to seeing the hatchery releases on paper, I still don't beleive it.... Keith
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Registered (4Salt, bcanini, bushbear, Dan S., epidemic, FishCatcher, Hankster, Jigman53, JoJo, Kanektok Kid, 5 invisible),
32
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
7727 Members
17 Forums
45351 Topics
440273 Posts
Max Online: 460 @ 03/07/08 06:52 PM
|
|
|