Like its going to be a panacea if the Repubs get the WH, look how disastrous it was last time. The ONLY thing the REPUGNANTS are interested in is making President Obama a one term president, even if it ruins this country.
Bush the talking head for Cheney, two unfunded wars and dead soldiers, billions lost and given away to corporate masters and trillions added to the deficit and leaving a colossal mess for the next guy to deal with.
Only thing Boehner and McConnell will do is try and get more tax breaks for their corporate masters.
Yeah the Repubs are so much better, right!!!!!
Fishy
_________________________
NRA Life member
The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.
I think name-calling is the right way to handle this one/Dan S
Labor Department data show that only a tiny percentage of companies that experience large layoffs cite government regulation as the reason. Since Barack Obama took office, just two-tenths of 1 percent of layoffs have been due to government regulation, the data show.
Okay. I provided empirical data from the Labor Department that showed government regulation had virtually no impact on layoffs. You then counter with a Gallup Poll indicating small businesses are worried about government regulation. How are they related? Because they both use the words government and regulation?
They seem mutually exclusive.
But since you provided the link...
Interesting that none of the small businesses named government regulations as a concern leading to going out of business. They only said following regulation by others like them were a concern. And what type of regulation? Following building codes? Not selling diseased meat and produce? I also noticed that only 12% said less government regulation was needed in order for their business to thrive. As opposed to the 29% that said they needed sales increase (demand) and job creation.
Maybe if the republican House would put together some type of meaningful jobs bill those 29% wouldn't have to worry so much.
_________________________
Tent makers for Christie, 2016.
#715469 - 11/03/1107:00 PMRe: Bad news for Dems
[Re: Hankster]
Todd
Stopped Making Porn for this
Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 19008
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
From the article...
"Obama has gone from a modest favorite to win re-election to, probably, a slight underdog. Let’s not oversell this. A couple of months of solid jobs reports, or the selection of a poor Republican opponent, would suffice to make him the favorite again. "
Job report is good this month...and whatever Republican is chosen, assuming he comes from the field as it exists now, is "poor" by definition...so I guess the answer to your questions is "no", Obama is not toast.
#715485 - 11/03/1107:35 PMRe: Bad news for Dems
[Re: Todd]
Hankster
Blue Haired Bay Area Hippie!
Registered: 01/24/07
Posts: 17129
Loc: City By The Bay
I think you'll have to rely on a poor Republican candidate. The "good" jobs report doesn't cover the number of people entering the workforce each month; let alone the 14+ million who are unemployed.
It will be interesting to say the least, to see Obama running on his record.
_________________________
"There is no solution. They'll never fix anything."
“There is science, logic, reason; there is thought verified by experience. And then there is California.” -Edward Abbey
#715489 - 11/03/1107:40 PMRe: Bad news for Dems
[Re: Hankster]
Todd
Stopped Making Porn for this
Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 19008
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
Without really having to get anything done between now and the election he can win...just keep sending stuff to the Republicans in Congress, who will reject everything, and keep pointing out that they are doing just that, and let the Republican nominees take turns stepping their own and each others' dicks for another year, and he'll have it wrapped up.
As fun as listening to you squirm If a Repub got into office and they used their roadmap to jobs, IE: tax breaks for the "jobs creators" and oh umm yeah and tax breaks for the "jobs creators", I don't think this country could take another round of "trickle down" poverty. Careful what you wish for you just may get it.
Fishy
_________________________
NRA Life member
The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.
I think name-calling is the right way to handle this one/Dan S
There's a few, first three that come up on Google...granted, it's not overwhelming support by any means, but more approve of it than disapprove...including those who live in districts with Republican representatives who are voting against the wishes of their constituencies. Why? Well, because they don't represent their constituencies, at least not the ones who are actual persons, rather than Romney's "CorporealCorporations".
#715499 - 11/03/1107:53 PMRe: Bad news for Dems
[Re: Todd]
Hankster
Blue Haired Bay Area Hippie!
Registered: 01/24/07
Posts: 17129
Loc: City By The Bay
Originally Posted By: Todd
P.S. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the health care plan.
Whoever runs for the GOP is going to hang that around his neck like a big brass bell. How it was passed; how "you have to pass it before you know what's in it"; how it even now is costing people more for their health insurance.
The big thing though will be J-O-B-S...and not the public employee J-O-B-S and not the road and bridge building J-O-B-S and not the "green technology" J-O-B-S.
J-O-B-S.
_________________________
"There is no solution. They'll never fix anything."
“There is science, logic, reason; there is thought verified by experience. And then there is California.” -Edward Abbey
#715501 - 11/03/1107:59 PMRe: Bad news for Dems
[Re: Hankster]
Todd
Stopped Making Porn for this
Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 19008
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
Yeah, I can see Willard getting really far with that argument
Let's face it...Mitt's gonna be the nominee, and even if the health care plan is the biggest thing the Republicans have got on Obama, the one single man running who can't say jackshit about it...is, of course, Willard Mitt Romney.
As I said in another thread...what a bunch of buffoons. I think if the Democrats were to infiltrate the Republican Party they could not have come up with a better group of idiots to run for the nomination...were I a cynical man I'd almost wonder if the TeaBaggers were actually funded by Buffet, instead of Dick Armey...they're worse for the Republicans than anything Democrats could have come up with.
Hank-----How it was passed; how "you have to pass it before you know what's in it"; how it even now is costing people more to bank at those banks after they were bailed out. The Bank bail out was rammed down our throats and cost us plenty, I thought this was a capitalist society where you either made or you didn't. I don't see much complaining about that here....
Fishy
_________________________
NRA Life member
The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.
I think name-calling is the right way to handle this one/Dan S
I'm sure this terrible economy has nothing to do with two unfunded wars and one of the most hated presidents in history running this country into the ground just like every business he ever ran ( Bush bankrupted 6-7 business's and no not the Rangers cause he was only a minor owner).
Fishy
_________________________
NRA Life member
The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.
I think name-calling is the right way to handle this one/Dan S