No! Wrong Answer! Sorry but you are getting warmer.

All zoogles are boogles. You saw a boogle. Is it a zoogle?

Is this helpful -

most killers are wild animals and most wild animals are killers.

there is an error here, but it is almost inconsequential. Our statistical intuitions have not evolved for a habitiat in which these subtleties can make a big difference.

if all zoogles are boogles, and i saw a boogle, wouldnt matter if it was a zoogle... cuz all zoogles are boogles...

all humans are the same regardless of how they look?

A somewhat brief description of Black Swan

To me this kind of stuff is like having 5 people standing shoulder to shoulder looking out a window.

All will see the same thing differently.

And in the end.....what does it matter?

As far as the topic of this thread goes.......no doubt either or both parties involved "could" have made many different choices......but they did what they did. To say that a 17 year old doesn't deserve to die might greatly depend on just what the facts are......and in any event, he's still dead. Is that good? bad? I don't know..... it is....that's it....it is.

It is bad...of course it is bad. Anytime a kid dies - it's bad....unless of course you gotta a problem with zoggles and boogles - then you probably don't give a [Bleeeeep!].

Saddam Hussein was 17 once.........Charles Manson was too........

Too bad they both didn't die sooner, wouldn't you say?

So you are saying the kid was a mini-sadam (even though he was an American) or a future Charles Manson - that is rather presumptuous - don't ya think? For all you know he was a future scientist who might have cured cancer. We Will NEVER know what he was to be.

BTW Charles Manson is STILL ALIVE!

most killers are wild animals: true, but not all are, some are humans, who arent wild nor technically animals...

most wild animals are killers: true, but not all are, some are vegitarians, in a way tho, they are killers as well, as vegetation is a living being...

this has confused the SH!T out of me... thanks alot... i will figure it out tho..

God bless ya for trying so hard to figure it out!

It is a logic question - an SAT question

replace zoogle & boogle with anything, any other word. Get it?

all potatoes are tomatos, did you see a potato? or was it a tomato?....


see that sh!t just confused me even more, because i know what each of them look like, and i sure as hell woulndt get them confused...

Try this redhook.........this may help......

All salmon are fish............you saw a fish........was it a salmon?

Now you SHOULD be able to reason out the answer.

not exactly, because there are many fish in the sea that look different...

i know this question is easy as hell too, my dad is probably laughing his a$$ off right now... it has litterally confused the hell out of me..

All potatoes are ___________. You saw a ___________ is it a potatoe?

All zoogles are boogles. You saw a boogle. Is it a zoogle?

Okay, did it wrong not any word - all children are adults - you saw an adult was it a child? - LOL!!!!!!!!!

The first sentence must be true! Sorry for that - gosh have had a rough week & you make me laugh - thanks for that!


The first sentence must be true to determine the next.

It really isn't a riddle.

Black Swan has suddenly appeared.

is this falling into the believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear category?

Probably. Or maybe the think twice about what you think category. Off to fb now to harass my cousins. bye

im more like a black duck... im not very swan like.

if i saw a zoogle, it had to be a boogle, because all zoogles are boogles...

True.......that part was already given......however the question is.........

If you saw a boogle.........is it a zoogle?

Remember:

All zoogles are boogles. You saw a boogle. Is it a zoogle?

Too bad I had the computer off....missed some of the non-sense.

How do you get to the point of "me saying" from what I posted? You are the one assuming, not I. Your proclamation was that it is ALWAYS bad when a 17 year old dies. My point was that by saying that you ASSUME that 17 is the only requirement to being a worthwhile individual. My point was that ALL people.....good and bad......are seventeen at one time (provided they live longer than that). Trevon was not exactly your roll model teen, was he? Kicked out of school, doing drugs, stealing,..........not a good start. Does that make him future cell bait? No, but it makes him more prone to be.
In this case this boogle could have been a zoogle, also may not have been a zoogle. One thing is for sure....this boogle bungled it.

bunglin boogles? thanks alot A$$..

i guess im just not college material... and i was thinking about going in for Welding, guess im screwed...