ondarvr,

Your conceptualization of this being about “sides” is kind of irrelevant in this case because he is an expert in the field, provided research, was engaging in a discussion about findings and science and was censored. I didn’t know part of the scientific process was to censor research, findings, and discussion. The research and information he provided simply runs against the narrative of government public health opinion.

Regarding the “miracle” drug, yes it is a small sample from which he worked with specifically, however he is one of a few providers who utilized the drug. When you add them all together it paints a similar and consistent picture around the efficacy of the drug. This is what practicing medicine is about, and he is being censored for it.

His argument about Vitamin D does not have much research, yet, but that does not mean he is inaccurate in his claims. Vitamin D is being heavily researched at the moment and what the latest literature is beginning to provide is evidence that Vitamin D plays a large role in battling SARS/corona viruses and boosting overall immunity. To my knowledge, he has no stake in benefiting personally to pushing a vitamin D, but I would be happy to change my opinion if you can show me otherwise.

He is a frontline doctor, and what he is saying is supported by the limited available scientific literature. Science also cannot refute what he is saying, either. We need to listen to experts in the field and frontline doctors, not censor them for failing to align with the government public health opinions.


-Steamy