I'll add a question that came out of the Yellowstone wolves. I don't know if what follows is still the case but it raises a question. The wolves certainly ate elk. The elk's response was to make smaller herds and moved more into the woods where they felt safer. For hunters, this meant that the elk were harder to hunt; still there, still available, but in rougher country. So, is it reasonable to still have huntable populations but they are just harder to get to?