Back in the 70s, in a collection of paper put out by Small Tribes of Western WA (somewhere in my library), Ernie Brannon had an article where he proposed that all salmon management be terminal and controlled by residents of the terminal area (watershed most likely).

If that management scheme controlled all fisheries on that stock, plus fisheries on the food base and predators, then it might work well for the fish. I say might because I suspect that logging interests in some watersheds, urban interests in others, would win out as they would have the most votes on any scheme.

The management of our resources is much more complex than just who gets to kill how many. I was gonna say that think we are past that time, or population level, where one can move off the grid and live by what they can catch/grow/produce independent of Rich's controlling groups. Maybe one or a few people can do it but not a society with the current number of people.