So who provides a larger positive impact(per fish)on the economy,sporties or commercials?
Who creates a more negative impact on the overall economy and industries effected by an increase in environmental regs to protect over harvested stocks,sports industry or commercial?
You're economic impact argument is great for TV ads where the commercials outspend the sporties and are more interested in the bottomline than the fish,but it's an argument used to BS the general public and not provide any enlightenment to them.
Good luck selling this argument to the sportsman.

[ 07-30-2001: Message edited by: Leadslinger ]