Quote:
Originally posted by Salmo g.:
Micro,

Just to be clear, science is not political. Science is a systematic process to obtain reliable information about things. Some people with political interests try to subvert science to a political agenda, but science has no agenda other than obtaining reliable information.

It wasn't science that said the world was flat; it was superstitious people. Probably the same about not taking bathes and the blanket covering the earth. You will improve your credibility by not attributing things to science that were not developed scientifically. However, your credibility in circles governed by fundy or superstitious beliefs will suffer.

Some of us science types are a bit sensitive about the mischaracterization of science.

Sincerely,

Salmo g.
Ok let me put it this way. Science by itself may not be political. But politics do play a role. Especially in the case of are own WDFW. Some biologist I worked with lost there jobs because of politics. Mainly because of one study which today I still cannot get my hands on. It was a study that originally proved warmwater fish in washington state were not as bad as this department has hollered for so many years. You may have heard something about it. Scott bonar basically stole it and moved to Arizona I contacted him At arizona state university and he said he would send a copy to me and he said he took it because it was unfinished which was B.S. politics due play a role in was science is let out to the public and also dictates which scientist keep there jobs. He tried to tell me that the study didnt look good for bass which after being on the study for three years I and the other bios new was total B.S . He changed it. Due to politics. The science our WDFW uses is bogus until they can prove to me they have changed.