The war in Iraq is strange to me. I never heard any real evidence Saddam had any part in 9/11. Aren't we after him because he supposedly has "WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION" hmm, now given the "how to deal with peace..." concept, shouldn't Iran be defending itself? That's the only country I'm aware of who has been the recipient of the preverbal punch in the nose from Iraq, right? Or are we the police men of the world? But Iran doesn't want us there on their behalf. But what about the Kurds and Kuwait? Kuwait is now a sovereign country again and the Kurdish people our of the same country as there attackers. You can make an argument we should be there to defend the Kurds, I wont argue that. So what is the right answer? I don't know. What I do know is this, Iraq didn't invade our country, they didn't attack any US embassy, or sink one of our ships or assassinate our leader. I believe it's simply an unjust war.

I'm a peace activist. The problem I have with this war and war in general (beside a fundamental problem with killing other humans) is that in never seems to solve the problem. Here is just one of many examples. Israel has now had 50 years of war because they were awarded a country as reparations for war atrocities. The atrocities were perpetrated by a country at war because they were going bankrupt trying to pay reparations for a war in which another countries prince was killed by a guy whose ancestors were murdered and raped in a war 200+ years earlier etc. I'll stop here but I could run it back a great deal further.
And the peace activist are silly idealist?

I believe 25 years ago this would have been a secret CIA lead rajime change. It wouldn't have dared been made public because the American public never would have supported it, not without 9/11 and the spin campaign from the White House. Now we have a supported, unjust war.

regards,
Skeeter