Cowlitz,

My electronic copy of the decision has been renumbered as pages 1-122 instead of the original page numbers of 326-423 and the only online version that I know of is formatted in a manner that makes it difficult to guess the page number of a particular paragraph.

Most of the quotes I posted are from parts I-IV so they may be found within the first few pages.

It is my observation that the decision may not be understood to its fullest without reading it entirely through more than one time.

I wonder what the outcome would be if the judgements were ever revisited by by the supreme court. I would think that the decision would stand in its entirety. What would you predict?

Today, the decision seems to be administered by the tribes with the backing of the USF&WS and with any enforcement being one sided.

It's a 1 for me, 1 for you; 2 for me, 1 for you; 3 for me, 1 for you; 4 for me, 1 for you setup.