The best player on the last place team is NEVER the most valuable player in the league, regardless of how the voting goes. What is it, exactly, that he's done for his team? Kept them from losing 100??

Please, numbers only? I suppose you guys that think numbers are all that matters think Bonds is justified in winning too, disregarding the fact that his teammates all think he's a big poopyhead. wink

The one A-Rod should have won was in '96. This one deserves an asterisk. The guy didn't even bat .300.

And don't *even* go thinking he'd buy into the Yankess putting him somewhere other than ss. Yuck, yuck.

They need to rename the award, plain and simple. Best player, biggest salary, biggest prima donna, whatever.